Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First stages of the nested-interval tree

Statement

Let L be the dense, endpoint-free, nowhere-separable ccc order used in the line-to-tree construction. The first three recursion stages may be chosen so that, for Ii=[ai,bi],

a0<a2<b2<a1<b1<b0.

Thus I1 and I2 are both nested strictly inside I0, while I1 and I2 are disjoint. More generally, at every stage each new closed interval is strictly nested in or disjoint from every earlier one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the order L above and the nested-interval recursion. Work in ZFC.

[F1]

The completed line-to-tree supplier recursively chooses closed intervals in the stated dense, endpoint-free, nowhere-separable ccc order and orders them by reverse nesting. Nested intervals form a Suslin tree

[A1]

AC supplies the simultaneous witness choices through all ω1 stages of the full recursion. The Axiom of Choice

Verification

1.1

At stage 0 there are no earlier endpoints. Choose c0<a0<b0<d0. The interval I0=[a0,b0] is nonempty and nondegenerate. The empty set of old endpoints creates no avoidance condition.

F1givenchoose
1.2

Fix any later stage α. The set Eα={aξ,bξ:ξ<α} is countable because α<ω1. It cannot be dense in L: if it were, then for any u<v the countable set Eα(u,v) would be dense in the nonempty open interval (u,v), contrary to nowhere-separability. Hence some nonempty open gap (c,d) misses Eα, and density lets the recursion choose c<aα<bα<d. Now fix ξ<α and write Iξ=[aξ,bξ]. There are exactly three relative positions. If (c,d) meets (aξ,bξ), order-convexity and endpoint avoidance force (c,d)(aξ,bξ), hence Iα(aξ,bξ). If it lies to the left, then bα<aξ; if it lies to the right, then bξ<aα. In the last two cases the two closed intervals, and therefore their open interiors, are disjoint. Equality at a boundary cannot occur because Iα lies strictly inside (c,d).

F1givenconstruct
2.1

At stage 1, use the nonempty open interval (a0,b0), which contains neither of its endpoint witnesses. Density gives a0<c1<a1<b1<d1<b0. Hence I1(a0,b0), so index 0 is a predecessor of index 1 in the reverse-nesting tree.

F1step 1.1choose
3.1

At stage 2, the interval (a0,a1) is nonempty and avoids all four earlier endpoints a0,b0,a1,b1. Choose a0<c2<a2<b2<d2<a1<b1<b0. It follows that I2(a0,b0) but I2I1=. Thus 0 is a predecessor of 2, whereas 1 and 2 are incomparable. This is the displayed three-stage configuration.

F1step 1.1step 2.1choose
4.1

Apply step 1.2 to every earlier index. If two earlier indices ξ,η both contain a later Iα, their own intervals intersect, so the disjoint alternative is impossible and one is nested inside the other according to index order. Therefore predecessor sets are linearly ordered. Conversely, incomparable indices must fall into the disjoint alternative; this is exactly what happens to indices 1 and 2 in step 3.1.

F1step 3.1step 1.2
5.1

Stages zero, one, and two respectively treat the empty old-endpoint set, a single old interval, and two earlier intervals. Every chosen interval has two strictly ordered endpoints; no empty or singleton interval is admitted. The finite trace uses only finitely many existential witnesses, while [A1] is retained for the simultaneous ω1-stage recursion in the supplier. The construction uses order endpoints only as avoided boundary points and assumes that the ambient line itself has no first or last element.

A1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2

Remarks

  • The indices 1 and 2 are siblings above 0 only in the order-theoretic sense: the construction does not assert that every node has immediate successors at the next ordinal stage.
  • The calculation uses symbolic points of the supplied Suslin-line reduction; replacing L by the real line would destroy the nowhere-separable hypothesis needed for the full ω1 recursion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources