How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First stages of the nested-interval tree
Statement
Let be the dense, endpoint-free, nowhere-separable ccc order used in the line-to-tree construction. The first three recursion stages may be chosen so that, for ,
Thus and are both nested strictly inside , while and are disjoint. More generally, at every stage each new closed interval is strictly nested in or disjoint from every earlier one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the order above and the nested-interval recursion. Work in ZFC.
The completed line-to-tree supplier recursively chooses closed intervals in the stated dense, endpoint-free, nowhere-separable ccc order and orders them by reverse nesting. Nested intervals form a Suslin tree
AC supplies the simultaneous witness choices through all stages of the full recursion. The Axiom of Choice
Verification
At stage there are no earlier endpoints. Choose The interval is nonempty and nondegenerate. The empty set of old endpoints creates no avoidance condition.
Fix any later stage . The set is countable because . It cannot be dense in : if it were, then for any the countable set would be dense in the nonempty open interval , contrary to nowhere-separability. Hence some nonempty open gap misses , and density lets the recursion choose . Now fix and write . There are exactly three relative positions. If meets , order-convexity and endpoint avoidance force , hence . If it lies to the left, then ; if it lies to the right, then . In the last two cases the two closed intervals, and therefore their open interiors, are disjoint. Equality at a boundary cannot occur because lies strictly inside .
At stage , use the nonempty open interval , which contains neither of its endpoint witnesses. Density gives Hence , so index is a predecessor of index in the reverse-nesting tree.
At stage , the interval is nonempty and avoids all four earlier endpoints . Choose It follows that but . Thus is a predecessor of , whereas and are incomparable. This is the displayed three-stage configuration.
Apply step 1.2 to every earlier index. If two earlier indices both contain a later , their own intervals intersect, so the disjoint alternative is impossible and one is nested inside the other according to index order. Therefore predecessor sets are linearly ordered. Conversely, incomparable indices must fall into the disjoint alternative; this is exactly what happens to indices and in step 3.1.
Stages zero, one, and two respectively treat the empty old-endpoint set, a single old interval, and two earlier intervals. Every chosen interval has two strictly ordered endpoints; no empty or singleton interval is admitted. The finite trace uses only finitely many existential witnesses, while [A1] is retained for the simultaneous -stage recursion in the supplier. The construction uses order endpoints only as avoided boundary points and assumes that the ambient line itself has no first or last element.
Remarks
- The indices and are siblings above only in the order-theoretic sense: the construction does not assert that every node has immediate successors at the next ordinal stage.
- The calculation uses symbolic points of the supplied Suslin-line reduction; replacing by the real line would destroy the nowhere-separable hypothesis needed for the full recursion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Monk, Set theory following Jech, Theorem 9.18 and complete proof, printed pp. 74-75 (standard reference, not scraped)