Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A gradient-descent path can be bounded below when the objective is not

Example

Let F(x,y)=x2−y2 on R2, start gradient descent at w0=(1,0), and use the fixed step α=1/4. The gradient is (2x,−2y) and is globally 2-Lipschitz. The iterates are wt=(2−t,0), so F(wt)=4−t≥0 and wt→(0,0), even though F is unbounded below on R2. The limit is stationary but is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F(x,y)=x2−y2, w0=(1,0), and fixed step α=1/4.

[F1]

The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder: a derivative is a linear map whose remainder is at most ε∥h∥2 for all sufficiently small increments, for every ε>0.

[F2]

Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn: a coordinate partial derivative is the limit of the difference quotient in that coordinate direction.

[F3]

The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case: for a scalar function, the gradient vector consists of its coordinate partial derivatives.

[F5]

Gradient descent: in fixed-step mode the update is wt+1=wt−α∇F(wt).

[F6]

Gradient descent has vanishing gradients when the objective is bounded below along its iterates: a continuously differentiable objective on Rn with globally L-Lipschitz gradient for L>0, fixed 0<α≤1/L, and a lower bound along its iterates has gradient norms tending to zero along those iterates.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3F4algebra

For z=(x,y) and v=(h,k), expansion gives F(z+v)−F(z)−(2xh−2yk)=h2−k2, whose absolute value is at most h2+k2=∥v∥22. For every ε>0, this is at most ε∥v∥2 when ∥v∥2<ε, so [F1] gives the total derivative. The coordinate difference quotients are 2x+h and −2y−k, so [F2, F3] give ∇F(x,y)=(2x,−2y). Therefore ∥∇F(z)−∇F(z′)∥22=4∥z−z′∥22, so F is continuously differentiable and its gradient is globally 2-Lipschitz.

2.1givenF5step 1.1algebrainduction

By [F5] and the gradient formula in step 1.1, wt+1=(xt/2,3yt/2). Starting from (1,0), induction gives yt=0 and xt=2−t for every t≥0.

3.1givenF6step 1.1step 2.1F7algebra∎

Step 2.1 gives F(wt)=4−t≥0 and wt→(0,0) by [F7], while F(0,s)=−s2 is unbounded below as ∣s∣→∞. The gradient at the limit is zero, but F(h,0)=h2>F(0,0) and F(0,h)=−h2<F(0,0) for every h≠0, so the limit is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum. Finally α=1/4≤1/2=1/L and the iterates have lower bound 0, so [F6] applies and gives vanishing gradient norms along this path.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.