Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-class one-layer spectral-margin calculation

Example

Assume the axiom of choice. Take one layer with input width 1, output width 2, identity activation with Lipschitz constant ρ1=1, reference matrix M1=0, and layer matrix A1=(1,−1)⊤. Let the input distribution be the point mass at (x,y)=(1,1), so a sample of size n=1 always has X=(1) and label 1. At margin level γ=1 and confidence δ=1/10, the score vector is (1,−1), its margin is 2, its empirical margin loss and population error are both zero, and the spectral network complexity is RA=2. The simultaneous theorem's right-hand side is 8+3Q/2, where Q=log⁡60+2log⁡3+2log⁡3+2log⁡4+2log⁡(2+2)≈13.72, so the bound evaluates to approximately 15.86. The example records the exact margin and complexity and shows the small-sample bound is valid but loose.

Example references

Spectral network complexity with reference matrices: defines the spectral complexity formula and induced operator norm.

Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss: defines multiclass margin, empirical margin loss, and population error.

A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks: supplies the simultaneous probability bound and its confidence expression.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-layer network, point-mass distribution, sample size, margin level, and confidence parameter in the Example.

[F1]

The spectral norm is the induced Euclidean operator norm, the transpose-difference mixed norm sums its column Euclidean norms, and RA is their prescribed spectral-complexity expression. Spectral network complexity with reference matrices

[F2]

The margin is true-label score minus the largest competing score; empirical margin loss counts examples with margin at most the threshold, and population error is zero-one classification error. Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss

[F3]

Under the stated iid and choice assumptions, the simultaneous theorem has an additive 8/n term, a leading term proportional to log⁡n, and confidence term 3Q/(2n). A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The only column of A1 has Euclidean norm 2, so its induced operator norm is 2. The transpose A1⊤=(1,−1) has two scalar columns of absolute values 1 and 1, so ∥A1⊤−M1⊤∥2,1=2. Also ∥X∥F=1.

2.1F2givenstep 1.1algebra

Applying the network map to x=1 gives scores (1,−1); [F2] therefore gives margin 1−(−1)=2, empirical margin loss 1{2≤1}=0, and zero population error under the point-mass law.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substitution into the spectral-complexity definition yields RA=2((2/2)2/3)3/2=2. For n=1 the leading term in [F3] vanishes because log⁡1=0, and 8/n=8. Substituting δ=1/10, γ=1, ∥X∥F=1, L=1, ∥A1⊤−M1⊤∥2,1=2, and ∥A1∥σ=2 into the theorem's Q gives the displayed expression. The inequality is 0≤8+3Q/2≈15.86.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources