How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-class one-layer spectral-margin calculation
Example
Assume the axiom of choice. Take one layer with input width , output width , identity activation with Lipschitz constant , reference matrix , and layer matrix . Let the input distribution be the point mass at , so a sample of size always has and label . At margin level and confidence , the score vector is , its margin is , its empirical margin loss and population error are both zero, and the spectral network complexity is . The simultaneous theorem's right-hand side is , where so the bound evaluates to approximately . The example records the exact margin and complexity and shows the small-sample bound is valid but loose.
Example references
Spectral network complexity with reference matrices: defines the spectral complexity formula and induced operator norm.
Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss: defines multiclass margin, empirical margin loss, and population error.
A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks: supplies the simultaneous probability bound and its confidence expression.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-layer network, point-mass distribution, sample size, margin level, and confidence parameter in the Example.
The spectral norm is the induced Euclidean operator norm, the transpose-difference mixed norm sums its column Euclidean norms, and is their prescribed spectral-complexity expression. Spectral network complexity with reference matrices
The margin is true-label score minus the largest competing score; empirical margin loss counts examples with margin at most the threshold, and population error is zero-one classification error. Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss
Under the stated iid and choice assumptions, the simultaneous theorem has an additive term, a leading term proportional to , and confidence term . A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks
Verification
The only column of has Euclidean norm , so its induced operator norm is . The transpose has two scalar columns of absolute values and , so . Also .
Applying the network map to gives scores ; [F2] therefore gives margin , empirical margin loss , and zero population error under the point-mass law.
Substitution into the spectral-complexity definition yields For the leading term in [F3] vanishes because , and . Substituting , , , , , and into the theorem's gives the displayed expression. The inequality is .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bartlett, Foster, and Telgarsky, Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks, Definition (1.2) and Theorem 1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)