How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss
Definition
Let , let be a Borel probability measure on , and let be a continuous score map. At its multiclass margin is The predicted label is Its population zero-one error is For , the ramp loss is The population ramp risk is . For a sample of length , the empirical ramp risk and empirical margin loss are The score coordinates are continuous, and finite maxima, comparisons, and the piecewise-linear ramp preserve Borel measurability. Thus the classification event and ramp loss in the displayed integrals are Borel sets or functions, so the risks are well-defined for .
Definition references
The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space: Borel subsets are members of the sigma-algebra generated by open sets.
Probability measures and probability spaces: a probability measure is a measure of total mass one.
Supervised prediction problems: fixes measurable instance and label spaces, a joint law, predictors, and measurable losses.
Population and empirical risk: defines population risk as an extended nonnegative integral and empirical risk as a finite sample average.
Bartlett, Foster, and Telgarsky, §3.1 and Appendix A.2: gives the multiclass margin operator and the ramp convention.
Mohri, Lecture 4, pp. 28–31: treats confidence margin, empirical margin loss, and margin-based risk bounds for binary scores.
Depends on
Used by
- A small empirical margin loss does not determine population error Example
- A two-class one-layer spectral-margin calculation Example
- Changing the reference matrix changes complexity, not the network Example
- Margin generalization for a bounded spectral-complexity class Lemma
- Uniform margin-risk deviation from empirical Rademacher complexity Lemma
- A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter L. Bartlett, Dylan J. Foster, and Matus Telgarsky, Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks, §3.1 and Appendix A.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mehryar Mohri, Foundations of Machine Learning, Lecture 4, pp. 28–31 (standard reference, not scraped)