How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A small empirical margin loss does not determine population error
Example
Assume the axiom of choice and take confidence level . Let the input always be and let the label distribution assign probability to class and to class . Use one identity-activation layer with and reference . For a sample of size , at margin threshold the event that the sampled label is class has probability , has empirical margin loss zero, while the network's population zero-one error is . The simultaneous theorem still permits this event because its term alone is ; the example shows that one zero empirical margin-loss observation does not itself determine population error.
Example references
Spectral network complexity with reference matrices: defines the network map and norm conventions.
Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss: defines the population zero-one error and empirical margin loss.
Population and empirical risk: defines population expectation and empirical averages.
A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks: supplies the finite-sample bound including the additive term.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-point label distribution, deterministic input, one-layer network, sample size, and margin threshold in the Example.
The network uses the zero-bias recurrence with an identity activation, and the operator norm is induced by the Euclidean norm. Spectral network complexity with reference matrices
The margin is true score minus the maximum competing score; empirical margin loss counts margins at most and population zero-one error is the probability of a wrong predicted label. Multiclass margins, ramp loss, and empirical margin loss
The theorem's upper bound includes the additive correction. A simultaneous spectral margin bound for multiclass networks
Verification
The scores at are . For label the margin is ; for label it is . Thus the network predicts class on both possible labeled outcomes.
By the label probabilities in the Example and [F2], the population zero-one error is . If the sample label is class , which occurs with probability , its only margin is , so its empirical margin loss is .
For , [F3] contributes to the theorem's right-hand side, already exceeding the population error ; all other displayed terms are nonnegative. Therefore the stated sample event is consistent with the theorem and demonstrates why empirical margin loss alone is not a population-error guarantee.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bartlett, Foster, and Telgarsky, Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks, Theorem 1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)