How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact MRI Fourier samples from a two-point object
Statement
Consider a two-point object in with locations and weights . At the two type-3 frequency samples the exact nonuniform Fourier samples are These are finite Fourier samples of a point-source model of an MRI object; no acquisition or reconstruction claim is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two locations, weights and frequency samples stated above.
Type-1, type-2, and type-3 nonuniform Fourier transforms: a type-3 sample is for finite real source and frequency lists.
The complex exponential by its power series: its power series defines every displayed value, and substituting gives .
Proof
For , both dot products are zero, so [F1] gives .
For , the dot products are and . Substituting these and the weights in [F1] yields , as claimed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leslie Greengard and June-Yub Lee, Accelerating the Nonuniform Fast Fourier Transform (standard reference, not scraped)