Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked oscillation decay and its Hölder modulus

Example

Example. Let n≥1, let Ω⊆Rn be open and let u:Ω→R have finite oscillation on every compactly contained ball and satisfy osc⁡Br(x)u≤θosc⁡B2r(x)u for all B2r(x)⋐Ω, in the setting of Geometric oscillation decay implies a Hölder modulus.

  1. If θ=12, then α0=1 and the lemma uses the capped exponent α=12 to give ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤2 (∣x−y∣/R)1/2osc⁡BR(x0)u for x,y∈BR/2(x0).
  2. If θ=2−1/3, then α0=α=13 and ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤41/3(∣x−y∣/R)1/3osc⁡BR(x0)u; smaller exponents have the corresponding constant 4α′.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set Ω⊆Rn, a function u:Ω→R with finite oscillation on every compactly contained ball satisfying osc⁡Br(x)u≤θosc⁡B2r(x)u whenever B2r(x)⋐Ω, and the two values θ=12 and θ=2−1/3.

[F1]

Oscillation-to-modulus conversion: under the stated finite-oscillation hypothesis, put α0=log⁡(1/θ)/log⁡2 and α=min⁡{α0,1/2}; then ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤4α(∣x−y∣/R)αosc⁡BR(x0)u for all x,y∈BR/2(x0), with 4α′ for every 0<α′<α (Geometric oscillation decay implies a Hölder modulus).

[F2]

Real powers with positive base satisfy 2−a=1/2a, log⁡(2a)=alog⁡2 and log⁡(1/θ)=−log⁡θ for θ∈(0,1) (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention); the Hölder seminorm on balls is defined as in Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls.

[F3]

The De Giorgi oscillation reduction produces a ratio θ∈(0,1) on balls satisfying its doubled-ball condition. Reserving this interior margin permits dyadic iteration; the resulting power-law conversion is the one illustrated in [F1] (De Giorgi oscillation reduction: one half-level set is small).

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The case θ=1/2. Since 1/θ=2, α0=log⁡2/log⁡2=1 and the capped exponent is α=1/2; [F1] gives ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤2 (∣x−y∣/R)1/2osc⁡BR(x0)u for x,y∈BR/2(x0).

2.1step 1.1givenF1F2F3algebra∎

The case θ=2−1/3. Here 1/θ=21/3, so α0=log⁡(21/3)/log⁡2=13=α; [F1] gives ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤41/3(∣x−y∣/R)1/3osc⁡BR(x0)u on BR/2(x0), so u is 13-Hölder there with the displayed constant. For the De Giorgi reduction, [F3] records the extra interior margin before the analogous dyadic conversion is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources