How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hensel lifting a simple root of X squared minus 2 in Z_7
Example
The congruence lifts to a root of in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial over .
Simple roots lift uniquely, and Newton iteration computes the lifted root (Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p, Newton's criterion in Q_p).
Verification
The residue class satisfies , and . By [L1], there is a unique root with .
The Newton step from is which is well defined in and already lies in the same residue class modulo ; iterating stays in that class and converges to the lifted root from step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Hensel's Lemma (standard reference, not scraped)