How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p
Statement
Let and . If
then there is a unique such that and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A polynomial and with and .
is the valuation ring in (Z_p is the valuation ring of Q_p).
is complete (The p-adic completion is a complete valued field).
Proof
Construct inductively so that Given , write with . Taylor expansion modulo gives Since , there is a unique choice of modulo making the right-hand side modulo .
The differences satisfy , so is a -adic Cauchy sequence. By [L2] it converges to some , and continuity of polynomial evaluation gives . Also , so .
If is another root with , then for the usual divided-difference polynomial . Modulo , one has , so is a unit of by [L1]. Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Hensel's Lemma, Theorem 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 8, Theorem 8.8 (standard reference, not scraped)