How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Square criterion in Q_p for odd p
Statement
Let be odd and let . Write
with and . Then is a square in if and only if is even and the reduction of in is a square.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An odd prime and with .
is the valuation ring of (Z_p is the valuation ring of Q_p).
Simple roots lift uniquely in (Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p).
Proof
If , write with . Then , so is even and the reduction of is the square of the reduction of in .
Conversely, assume and the residue class of is in . Choose with . For , one has and because is odd and . By [L2], has a root with . Then satisfies .
Step 1.1 proves necessity and step 1.2 proves sufficiency.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Hensel's Lemma, Examples 4.3 and 4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 10 (standard reference, not scraped)