How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A square root of minus one in Q_5
Example
The element is a square in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial over .
For odd , a unit of is a square in exactly when its residue class is a square in (Square criterion in Q_p for odd p).
Simple roots lift uniquely, and Newton iteration gives the same root (Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p, Newton's criterion in Q_p).
Verification
Modulo one has . Since is a unit, [L1] shows that is a square in .
Concretely, and , so [L2] produces a unique -adic root congruent to modulo .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Hensel's Lemma, Examples 4.3 and 4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)