How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The value phi_1(0) is obtained directly from its series
Statement
For the zero matrix, verify directly that and that the augmented exponential returns this value without evaluating .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
Phi recurrence and augmented-matrix action identities: the first coordinate of is , with no division by or a scalar.
Proof
Since and for every , the series in [F1] has only the term nonzero. Hence .
Here and , so and . Therefore ; [F2] identifies its first coordinate with . The quotient is undefined at , while the series and augmented action above are defined there.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Awad H. Al-Mohy and Nicholas J. Higham, Computing the action of the matrix exponential, with an application to exponential integrators (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jitse Niesen and Will M. Wright, A Krylov subspace algorithm for evaluating the phi-functions appearing in exponential integrators (standard reference, not scraped)