Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Matrix exponential and phi function actions — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples verify the phi-one augmented action at zero without a removable-singularity quotient, show how a one-vector Arnoldi projection can miss the slow mode of a stiff diagonal matrix, and compute an exact transient-growth example with a valid logarithmic-norm residual certificate. Their calculations use exact arithmetic; the theorem's separate finite-precision terms remain conditional on certified relation and reduced-action data.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The value phi_1(0) is obtained directly from its series

Statement

For the zero 1×1 matrix, verify directly that φ1(0)=1 and that the augmented exponential returns this value without evaluating (ez−1)/z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X=[0]∈M1(C), w=[1]∈C, and k=1.

[F1]

The phi-function family by everywhere-convergent series: φ1(X)=∑j≥0Xj/(j+1)!, with X0=In.

[F2]

Phi recurrence and augmented-matrix action identities: the first coordinate of eB1(X,w)(0,1)T is φ1(X)w, with no division by X or a scalar.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Since X0=[1] and Xj=[0] for every j≥1, the series in [F1] has only the term 1/1!=1 nonzero. Hence φ1(X)=[1].

2.1givenstep 1.1F2algebra∎

Here J1=[0] and B1(X,w)=[0100]=:N, so N2=0 and eN=I+N. Therefore eN(0,1)T=(1,1)T; [F2] identifies its first coordinate with φ1(X)w=1. The quotient (ez−1)/z is undefined at z=0, while the series and augmented action above are defined there.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

A one-dimensional Arnoldi projection misses a slow mode of a stiff diagonal matrix

Statement

Let A=diag⁡(−100,−1), v=(1,1)T, t=1/10, and use one Arnoldi step (m=1). Compute the projected exponential action, compare it exactly with etAv, and evaluate the residual-integral bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated real diagonal matrix, nonzero starting vector, time, and exact-arithmetic Arnoldi run with m=1.

[F1]

The Arnoldi process for building an orthonormal basis of a Krylov subspace and Before breakdown, Arnoldi produces an orthonormal Krylov basis and a rectangular upper-Hessenberg factorization: the first Arnoldi vector is q1=v/∥v∥2, H1=q1∗Aq1, and Aq1=H1q1+h2,1q2 when the residual is nonzero.

[F2]

Arnoldi projection for exponential and phi-function actions: for k=0, the exact projected action is ∥v∥2V1etH1e1.

[F3]

Arnoldi action error is the semigroup-weighted residual integral: with exact Arnoldi and exact reduced action, zero initial mismatch, and D=Ω=0, the error is bounded by the semigroup-weighted integral of h2,1∣e1∗c(s)∣, where c(s)=esH1∥v∥2e1.

[F4]

The phi-function family by everywhere-convergent series: the diagonal exponential acts entrywise by the scalar exponential series.

[F5]

The Euclidean logarithmic norm of a complex matrix: μ2(A) is the largest eigenvalue of the Hermitian part (A+A∗)/2.

[F6]
[F7]

exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: the complex exponential satisfies its addition law and agrees with the real exponential on real inputs.

[F8]

The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡: (exp⁡x)′=exp⁡x for real x.

[F10]

If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz: for a continuously differentiable real scalar function, its definite integral is the endpoint difference of an antiderivative.

[F11]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous real-valued function on a nondegenerate closed bounded interval is Riemann integrable.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

We have ∥v∥2=2 and q1=(1,1)T/2. Thus H1=q1∗Aq1=−101/2. The Arnoldi residual is Aq1−H1q1=(−99,99)T/(22), so its norm is 99/2 and its normalization is q2=(−1,1)T/2.

2.1givenstep 1.1F2F4F6F7algebra

By [F2], the projected action is 2q1e−101/20=e−101/20(1,1)T. By [F4], the exact action is (e−10,e−1/10)T. Its exact error vector is (e−10−e−101/20,e−1/10−e−101/20)T, which is nonzero because [F7] identifies these real-argument complex exponentials with the real exponential, and −1/10≠−101/20 with injectivity from [F6].

3.1givenF3F5F7F8F9F10F11step 1.1algebra∎

The matrix is Hermitian with largest eigenvalue −1, so [F5] gives μ2(A)=−1. Here c(s)=2e−101s/2 and the initial mismatch v−2q1 is zero. By [F3], the certificate is ∥etAv−V1etH12e1∥2≤∫01/10e−(1/10−s)(99/2)2e−101s/2 ds. By the addition law [F7] its integrand is e−1/10(99/2)2e−99s/2, a continuous real function on [0,1/10] and hence integrable by [F11]. The antiderivative −(2/99)e−99s/2 follows from [F8] and [F9]; applying [F10] yields the bound 2e−1/10(1−e−99/20). Thus the slow component e−1/10 is missed by the one-dimensional projection even though the residual certificate applies.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

A nonnormal action grows transiently while its Arnoldi residual certificate remains valid

Statement

Let A=[−130−1], v=e2, t=1, and use one exact Arnoldi step. Compute the exact action and projection, its residual certificate, and the logarithmic-norm growth bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated real matrix, starting vector, time, and exact-arithmetic Arnoldi run with m=1.

[F1]

The Arnoldi process for building an orthonormal basis of a Krylov subspace and Before breakdown, Arnoldi produces an orthonormal Krylov basis and a rectangular upper-Hessenberg factorization: Arnoldi starts with q1=v/∥v∥2 and represents Aq1=H1q1+h2,1q2 for a nonzero residual.

[F2]

Arnoldi projection for exponential and phi-function actions: the exact one-step exponential projection is ∥v∥2V1etH1e1.

[F3]

The phi-function family by everywhere-convergent series and The scalar and matrix phi series converge absolutely: scalar and matrix exponentials are given by their absolutely convergent power series; in particular eA=∑j≥0Aj/j! and exp⁡(−1)=∑j≥0(−1)j/j!.

[F4]

The Euclidean logarithmic norm of a complex matrix and The logarithmic norm bounds forward and reverse matrix exponentials: μ2(A) is the largest eigenvalue of (A+A∗)/2, and ∥eτA∥2≤eτμ2(A) for τ≥0.

[F5]

Arnoldi action error is the semigroup-weighted residual integral: the exact action error is the initial mismatch term plus the oriented integral of e(t−s)A(AV−VH)c(s); its norm is bounded by the logarithmic-norm-weighted residual integral, with no added D, Ω, or reduced-action term when these are zero.

[F7]

The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x): for every real x, exp⁡(x)>0 and exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x).

[F8]

exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential: the complex exponential satisfies its addition law and agrees with the real exponential on real inputs.

[F9]

The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡: (exp⁡x)′=exp⁡x for real x.

[F11]

If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz: for a continuously differentiable real scalar function, the definite integral equals the endpoint difference of an antiderivative.

[F12]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: every continuous real-valued function on a nondegenerate closed bounded interval is Riemann integrable.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F8algebra

With q1=e2, H1=e2∗Ae2=−1 and Ae2−H1e2=3e1, so h2,1=3 and q2=e1. Therefore [F2] gives the projection e−1e2, where [F8] identifies this scalar value with the real exponential.

2.1givenF3F6F7F8step 1.1algebrainduction

Write A=−I+N, where N=[0300] and N2=0. For j=1, A=(−1)I+N; if Aj=(−1)jI+j(−1)j−1N, multiplying by −I+N and using N2=0 yields Aj+1=(−1)j+1I+(j+1)(−1)jN. Thus induction proves the formula for all j≥1. Substituting into [F3] and using absolute convergence to reindex gives eA=∑j≥0Aj/j!=(∑j≥0(−1)j/j!)I+(∑j≥1(−1)j−1/(j−1)!)N=e−1(I+N). By [F8], the scalar complex value at −1 is the real e−1, and [F7] gives e−1=1/e. Thus eAe2=e−1(3e1+e2) and the exact projection error is 3/e. For every j≥1, the j−1 factors 2,…,j in j! are at least 2, so j!≥2j−1, strictly for j≥3; hence [F6] gives e=1+∑j≥11/j!<1+∑j≥12−(j−1)=3<10. Positivity and reciprocity in [F7] now give ∥eAe2∥2=10/e>1, so the action grows in norm from the unit initial vector.

3.1givenF4F5F8F9F10F11F12step 1.1algebra∎

The Hermitian part is [−13/23/2−1], with eigenvalues 1/2 and −5/2, hence by [F4] μ2(A)=1/2. The semigroup bound in [F4] is ∥eτA∥2≤eτ/2. In the residual estimate c(s)=e−s, so [F5] gives ∥eAe2−e−1e2∥2≤∫013e(1−s)/2e−s ds. By [F8], the integrand is 3e1/2e−3s/2, which is continuous on [0,1] and integrable by [F12]. An antiderivative of e−3s/2 is −(2/3)e−3s/2 by [F9] and [F10]; [F11] then evaluates the bound as 2e1/2(1−e−3/2). For the exact residual identity in [F5], Ne1=0 gives e(1−s)Ae1=e−(1−s)e1. The addition law [F8] makes the residual integrand the constant vector 3e−1e1, whose coordinates are continuous and integrable by [F12]; [F11] gives ∫01e(1−s)A(3e−se1) ds=(3/e)e1, consistent with the exact error. The certificate remains valid in this nonnormal case, while the positive logarithmic norm allows transient growth.

Sources