Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar decomposition of the unilateral shift

Example

Assume AC. On H=ℓ2(N0;C) let S be the unilateral shift Sen=en+1. Then S∗S=I, SS∗=I−P where P is the orthogonal projection onto Ce0, and ∣S∣=I; the polar partial isometry of S is S itself, with initial space H and final space (Ce0)⊥. In particular S is an isometry that is not a coisometry and not unitary.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

ℓ2(N0;C) has orthonormal basis (en) with ⟨x,en⟩=xn, and every x is the norm limit of its finite expansions ∑n<N⟨x,en⟩en; the closed linear span of {en:n≥1} is exactly (Ce0)⊥ (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I), A Hilbert space with a given orthonormal basis is ℓ2 of the index set, Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).

[A2]

⟨S∗x,y⟩=⟨x,Sy⟩, so S∗S and SS∗ are determined by their values on the basis; an isometry is exactly an operator with U∗U=I, a coisometry has UU∗=I, and a partial isometry vanishes on its kernel and is isometric on the orthogonal complement of the kernel (Hilbert-adjoint identities, Isometry coisometry and partial isometry).

[A3]

∣S∣=(S∗S)1/2 is the unique positive square root, and the polar partial isometry U satisfies S=U∣S∣ and ker⁡U=ker⁡S, with initial space ran⁡∣S∣‾ and final space ran⁡S‾ (Absolute value of a bounded operator, Polar decomposition for bounded operators).

[A4]

AC is the hypothesis of the polar-decomposition and Hilbert-space suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: The shift S on ℓ2(N0;C) defined by Sen=en+1.

1.1A1A2

S is a well-defined bounded linear isometry: for x=∑nxnen the series Sx=∑nxnen+1 converges with ∥Sx∥22=∑n∣xn∣2=∥x∥22, so S∗S=I and ∥S∥=1.

2.1step 1.1A1A2

SS∗=I−P: for the basis vectors S∗e0=0 and S∗en+1=en, so ⟨SS∗em,ek⟩=⟨S∗em,S∗ek⟩ equals 1 for m=k≥1 and 0 otherwise; hence SS∗ is the identity on the closed span of {en:n≥1}=(Ce0)⊥ and vanishes on Ce0.

2.2step 1.1A3

∣S∣=I: since S∗S=I, the identity is positive with square I=S∗S, so by uniqueness of the positive square root ∣S∣=I.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

Consequently ker⁡S={0} and ran⁡S=(Ce0)⊥, and S is an isometry that is not a coisometry: SS∗≠I because SS∗e0=0.

4.1step 3.1step 2.2A2A3

The polar partial isometry of S is U=S: indeed S=S⋅I=S∣S∣, ker⁡S={0}=ker⁡U, and S is a partial isometry, being isometric on H=(ker⁡S)⊥ and vanishing on ker⁡S={0}; uniqueness in the polar decomposition identifies it.

5.1step 4.1A4∎

The initial space is (ker⁡S)⊥=H and the final space is ran⁡S‾=(Ce0)⊥, as asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources