Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar decomposition for bounded operators

Statement

Assume AC. Every bounded operator T on a nonzero complex Hilbert space has a unique partial isometry U with T=UT and kerU=kerT; its initial space is ranT and its final space is ranT.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

T is positive, T2=TT, Tx=Tx and kerT=kerT (Absolute value of a bounded operator).

[A2]

(ranS)=kerS and ranS=(kerS), so for S=T the closure of the range is (kerT)=(kerT) (Kernel–range orthogonality for Hilbert adjoints).

[A3]

For the closed subspace M the space decomposes as H=MM and the orthogonal projection PM is the linear self-adjoint idempotent with range M and kernel M (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).

[A4]

U is a partial isometry when it vanishes on kerU and is isometric on (kerU), with initial space (kerU) and final space ranU; a bounded operator isometric on a closed subspace and zero on its orthogonal complement is a partial isometry (Isometry coisometry and partial isometry, Partial isometry characterizations).

[A5]

A bounded linear map that is isometric on a subspace extends uniquely to an isometry on its closure, since the Hilbert space is complete and the extension is obtained by limits of Cauchy images; the operator norm controls such extensions (Hilbert space, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[A6]

AC is the hypothesis of the square-root and Hilbert-space suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: A nonzero complex Hilbert space H and a bounded operator TB(H), with T=(TT)1/2 and M:=ranT.

1.1

The subspace M is closed with M=(kerT)=(kerT), and H=MM.

A1A2A3
1.2

The assignment V(Tx):=Tx on ranT is well defined, because Tx=Ty implies xykerT=kerT and hence Tx=Ty, and it is isometric, because V(Tx)=Tx=Tx.

A1algebra
2.1

V extends uniquely to a bounded linear isometry U on the closure M of its domain: an isometry on a dense subspace is uniformly continuous, its images of Cauchy sequences are Cauchy and converge by completeness, and the limit is independent of the sequence.

step 1.2A5
3.1

Extend U to H=MM by U=0 on M; then U is bounded and linear, kerU=M=kerT, and U is isometric on M=(kerU), so U is a partial isometry with initial space M and final space ranU=ranT.

step 2.1step 1.1A3A4A5
3.2

T=UT: for every x one has TxranTM and U(Tx)=V(Tx)=Tx by construction.

step 2.1step 1.2
4.1

Uniqueness: if W is a partial isometry with T=WT and kerW=kerT, then on the dense subspace ranT of M one has W(Tx)=Tx=U(Tx); both W and U vanish on M=kerT and both are continuous, so W and U agree on M and on M, hence W=U.

step 3.1step 3.2step 1.1A1
5.1

Therefore U is the unique partial isometry with T=UT and kerU=kerT, with initial space ranT and final space ranT, as asserted.

step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1A6

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources