How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A predictable linear forecast and its empirical residual process
Example
Assume AC, fix , and choose a Borel one-sided sub-exponential uniform boundary with crossing probability at scale . Let be independent Bernoulli random variables with success probability , set , and let and . Use the predictable linear forecast . Then and almost surely. On the path , which has probability , the algorithm has , , and returns The forecast is predictable and differs from the conditional mean when ; the full interval sequence still covers its target sequence with probability at least .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC. The Bernoulli stream, filtration, forecast, error level, boundary, algorithm, and target sequence in the Example.
Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra: a conditional-expectation version is measurable and has the defining event integrals.
Conditional expectation is unique almost surely: conditional-expectation versions with the same input and conditioning sigma-algebra agree almost surely.
Empirical-Bernstein confidence-sequence interval update: at time , the output is centered at with radius .
Empirical-Bernstein confidence sequence under adaptive sampling: for these bounded observations and predictable forecasts, the intervals cover the running average conditional-mean target at all times with probability at least .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is explicitly assumed here and by the coverage theorem; the definition of a conditional-expectation version imposes no AC assumption.
Verification
For each , the atoms of are the events , with for . Each atom has positive probability, and independence gives and . Thus the constant has the defining event integrals on every atom and every union of atoms, so it is a version of by [F1]; [F2] identifies it with the chosen conditional-expectation class.
The forecast is a function of , hence -measurable, and its values are or ; when it equals , not the conditional mean . On the specified path, the four squared errors are , so and . Independence gives the path probability .
By [F3], the algorithm returns the displayed interval at time . Its hypotheses hold with , ; therefore [F4] gives . In particular, using [A1], the interval sequence is a confidence sequence for the adapted target process defined in the Example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.