How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The product defines an entire zero-free tail limit after the first factor
Example
The product
converges normally on , hence defines an entire function. On every compact set, all but finitely many factors are zero-free, so the tail limit is zero-free there.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The factors for .
A normally convergent holomorphic product defines a holomorphic function, and after finitely many factors the tail contributes no zeros on a fixed compact set (Normally convergent products define holomorphic functions with the expected zeros).
Verification
On a compact disc one has , so the product is normally convergent.
Therefore [F1] makes the product entire, and on each compact disc only finitely many factors can vanish because eventually lies outside the disc.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Matthias Weber, Complex Analysis, Ch. 3 §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)