How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projecting a space curve can create a double point
Example
On , consider the embedded space curve
Projecting along the -axis gives
The distinct parameters and have the same projected image, so this projection creates double points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The space curve above and the -coordinate projection .
Verification
The curve is smooth and embedded: the first two coordinates already parametrize the standard unit circle, so the third coordinate only lifts that circle into space.
The projection forgets the -coordinate. Since and , one has for every , while away from and . Thus the projected curve has double points.
This is a concrete bad direction of the type excluded by A generic linear projection preserves injectivity and immersion, so it witnesses the false claim FALSE: an arbitrary linear projection of an embedding is an embedding.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Lemma 6.13 (standard reference, not scraped)