How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Trace distance of orthogonal pure states
Example
Let with orthonormal computational basis , and set and . Their trace distance is maximal, and the computational-basis projective measurement distinguishes them with total variation one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two orthogonal computational-basis unit vectors in .
The rank-one operators associated with orthonormal unit vectors are rank-one orthogonal projections (Pure state and ray, Ray-to-projector is well-defined and bijective).
A PVM with effects has outcome law (Finite POVMs and their outcome law).
Verification
In the basis , , whose singular values are . Thus and [F2] gives .
The computational-basis PVM has effects and . By [F3], the outcome laws are on and on , with total variation . This equals the trace distance from step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information (standard reference, not scraped)