How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The discriminant of and its double-root criterion
Example
For over a field,
This vanishes exactly when has a repeated root, in every characteristic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a monic quadratic , and roots in a splitting field.
The discriminant of a split monic quadratic is and vanishes exactly for a repeated root (The discriminant is and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root).
Verification
Expand .
Substitute [L2] into step 1.1 to get , and apply [L1] to identify this with .
By [L1], this element vanishes exactly when . In characteristic two the formula becomes , while , so the same repeated-root criterion remains valid; completing a square is a separate issue.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, discriminant discussion (standard reference, not scraped)