How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The discriminant is and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root
Statement
Let be a field and let be monic of degree . In a splitting field write
Then
Moreover, if and only if has a repeated root. This criterion holds in every characteristic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a monic polynomial , and a splitting field with roots .
The discriminant is the coefficient expression obtained from , and in a split algebra it evaluates to (The discriminant of a monic polynomial as the coefficient expression of ).
A splitting field presents as a product of linear factors with roots counted according to multiplicity (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).
A root of a nonzero polynomial is repeated if and only if (A root is repeated exactly when it is also a root of the formal derivative).
Proof
Evaluate the coefficient expression in [L1] at the roots supplied by [L2]. The definition of gives .
Because the splitting field is a field, this finite product is zero exactly when one factor is zero, equivalently when two entries in the root list coincide.
Two entries coincide exactly when the linear factor at that root occurs at least twice, so has a repeated root. By [L3] this agrees with the derivative criterion. No step divides by , so the equivalence remains valid in characteristic two.
Depends on
Used by
- For monic f of degree n, Res(f,f')=(-1)^n(n-1)/2Disc(f) Corollary
- A branched projection of a smooth hypersurface Counterexample
- Discriminant and branch set of a fixed Weierstrass projection Definition
- The discriminant of x²+bx+c and its double-root criterion Example
- A reduced prepared hypersurface stays reduced nearby Lemma
- An irreducible plane curve gives a connected punctured covering Lemma
- Reduced preparation has nonzero discriminant Lemma
- The vanishing ideal of a reduced hypersurface germ is principal Lemma
- Convergent Puiseux parametrisation of an irreducible plane branch Theorem
- Finite local projection of a reduced hypersurface germ Theorem
- For a monic separable polynomial in characteristic not two, the Galois group lies in Aₙ exactly when the discriminant is a square Theorem
- Nonvanishing of the lattice discriminant Theorem
- Polynomial arithmetic cost for rounded-input bounded-grid root isolation Theorem
- Singular locus of a reduced analytic hypersurface Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Proposition 4.35 through Example 4.37 (standard reference, not scraped)