How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For monic of degree ,
Statement
Let be a field and let be monic of degree . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A monic polynomial of degree , split as in a splitting field.
The root-product formula gives (For monic , and it vanishes exactly when and have a common root).
The discriminant root formula is (The discriminant is and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root).
The formal derivative of is (The formal derivative of a polynomial).
Over a commutative ring, formal differentiation is additive and -linear and satisfies (Linearity, power rule, Leibniz rule and the degree bound for the formal derivative).
Proof
Iterating the Leibniz rule of [L4] over the factors of gives , since each by [L3]. At , every summand except the -th contains the zero factor , so .
By [L1], . Group the two ordered factors belonging to each unordered pair .
For each , . There are unordered pairs, so step 2.1 becomes .
Apply [L2] to identify the remaining product with . The empty-degree cases give .
Depends on
- For monic $f$, $\operatorname{Res}(f,g)=\prod_i g(\alpha_i)$ and it vanishes exactly when $f$ and $g$ have a common root
- The discriminant is $\prod_{i<j}(\alpha_i-\alpha_j)^2$ and vanishes exactly when a monic polynomial has a repeated root
- The formal derivative of a polynomial
- Linearity, power rule, Leibniz rule and the degree bound for the formal derivative
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Proposition 4.35 and discriminant discussion (standard reference, not scraped)