How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For monic , if , then
Statement
Let be a field, let be monic, and let satisfy
Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Polynomials satisfying the identity in the Statement, with monic.
If has roots in a splitting field, then for every polynomial (For monic , and it vanishes exactly when and have a common root).
Polynomial evaluation is a ring homomorphism and an element is a root of exactly when (Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).
Proof
For every root of , evaluate to obtain , hence .
Apply [L1] to and and multiply the equal values from step 1.1 to obtain equality of the resultants.
If , then and both resultants are the empty product ; the argument remains valid.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 20 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Proposition 4.35(c) (standard reference, not scraped)