Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-stump strength and correlation calculation

Example

Let X∈{0,1}, Y=X, with P(X=0,Y=0)=3/4 and P(X=1,Y=1)=1/4. Conditional on fixed training data, let each randomized tree independently be the constant class-0 stump with probability 3/4 and the constant class-1 stump with probability 1/4. For a randomization θ, write pc(x)=Q{h(x,θ)=c}; for y∈{0,1} define m(x,y)=py(x)−p1−y(x), s=E[m(X,Y)], and PE∗=P{m(X,Y)<0}. For each tree set rθ(x,y)=1{h(x,θ)=y}−1{h(x,θ)=1−y} and sd(θ)=Var⁡X,Y(rθ(X,Y)). For independent randomizations Θ,Θ′ let d=EQsd(Θ) and ρ=EQ×Q[Cov⁡X,Y(rΘ,rΘ′)]/d2. Then the limiting margins at the two test pairs are m(0,0)=1/2 and m(1,1)=−1/2, so s=1/4 and PE∗=1/4. Each tree's raw-margin standard deviation is 3/4, the covariance numerator defining ρ is 3/16, and ρ=1/4. The strength-correlation bound has right-hand side 15/4 in this example.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The test law and independent two-stump randomization law in the Example.

[F1]

Bagged random-forest construction on a fixed finite sample: A regression or classification forest aggregates trees with a fixed class order, and a classification tree casts one class vote.

[F2]

Breiman's random-forest strength–correlation error bound: The strength is s=EPm, tree standard deviations are sd(θ)=Var⁡P(rθ), and for d>0 the correlation parameter is the expected independent-pair covariance divided by d2.

[F3]

Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: Expectation on a probability space is integration against its probability measure.

[F4]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Variance and covariance are expectations of the corresponding centered products.

[F5]

Independent random elements have product joint law: The joint law of a finite independent family of random elements is the product of their marginal laws.

Verification

1.1F1F2F3algebra

By the tree-vote convention [F1], at Z=(0,0) the correct class receives probability 3/4 and the wrong class 1/4, giving margin 1/2. At Z=(1,1), the correct class receives probability 1/4 and the wrong class 3/4, giving margin −1/2. Therefore s=(3/4)(1/2)+(1/4)(−1/2)=1/4 and PE∗=1/4.

1.2F2F3F4algebra

For tree type A, the raw margin is +1 at (0,0) and −1 at (1,1); its mean is 1/2 and its second moment is 1, so its variance is 3/4. Type B reverses the two signs, giving mean −1/2 and the same variance 3/4. Thus sd(A)=sd(B)=3/4 and d2=3/4.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.2algebra

The independent pair has probabilities P(A,A)=9/16, P(B,B)=1/16, and total mixed probability 6/16. The covariance over Z is 3/4 for equal types and −3/4 for mixed types, so its expectation is [(9+1−6)/16](3/4)=3/16. By [F2] and [F5], ρ=(3/16)/(3/4)=1/4.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Substitution gives ρ(1−s2)/s2=(1/4)(15/16)/(1/16)=15/4, and the example's error 1/4 satisfies the bound.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources