How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-stump strength and correlation calculation
Example
Let , , with and . Conditional on fixed training data, let each randomized tree independently be the constant class- stump with probability and the constant class- stump with probability . For a randomization , write ; for define , , and . For each tree set and . For independent randomizations let and . Then the limiting margins at the two test pairs are and , so and . Each tree's raw-margin standard deviation is , the covariance numerator defining is , and . The strength-correlation bound has right-hand side in this example.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The test law and independent two-stump randomization law in the Example.
Bagged random-forest construction on a fixed finite sample: A regression or classification forest aggregates trees with a fixed class order, and a classification tree casts one class vote.
Breiman's random-forest strength–correlation error bound: The strength is , tree standard deviations are , and for the correlation parameter is the expected independent-pair covariance divided by .
Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: Expectation on a probability space is integration against its probability measure.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Variance and covariance are expectations of the corresponding centered products.
Independent random elements have product joint law: The joint law of a finite independent family of random elements is the product of their marginal laws.
Verification
By the tree-vote convention [F1], at the correct class receives probability and the wrong class , giving margin . At , the correct class receives probability and the wrong class , giving margin . Therefore and .
For tree type , the raw margin is at and at ; its mean is and its second moment is , so its variance is . Type reverses the two signs, giving mean and the same variance . Thus and .
The independent pair has probabilities , , and total mixed probability . The covariance over is for equal types and for mixed types, so its expectation is . By [F2] and [F5], .
Substitution gives , and the example's error satisfies the bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.