How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relator root versus proper power
Example
For the symmetrisation of , the root is , equal cyclic rotations do not create pieces, and is cyclic of exact order seven.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-generator presentation with the symmetrised relator set of .
Pieces require distinct full symmetrised words (Sc toolkit symmetrised relators and pieces).
Relator roots are nonempty words not literally proper powers (Minimal cyclic power diagram and relator root).
Verification
The symmetrised set is exactly . Its two words start in different letters, so have no nonempty common prefix; equal positive rotations all give the first word and equal inverse rotations the second. Thus there are no pieces and holds vacuously by [F1]. The one-letter word cannot be a proper power of a nonempty shorter word, so it is a root by [F2].
Every one-generator word freely reduces to for an integer , since any change of sign in the string creates an adjacent inverse pair. The relation reduces the exponent modulo seven, so every element is one of . The exponent sum modulo seven is unchanged by free cancellation and by inserting or deleting any conjugate of : the conjugating exponents cancel and the relator contributes a multiple of seven. It therefore defines a homomorphism from the quotient to the additive residues modulo seven, taking to the residue of .
The seven displayed elements have distinct images, so they are distinct; step 1.2 also proves that they exhaust the quotient. In particular and for . This proves exact order seven, while keeping the literal word root distinct from its quotient image.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lipschutz (1964), §6 common-root exception; cyclic-group example computed locally (standard reference, not scraped)