How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
ReLU and logistic sigmoid activation examples
Example
Assume Countable Choice. The rectified linear activation and the logistic sigmoid both satisfy the pointwise locally bounded activation hypotheses and are not polynomials almost everywhere. Under the corresponding single-hidden-layer universality theorem, each gives uniform approximation of continuous functions on every compact subset of , with no width bound asserted.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
The pointwise locally bounded subclass consists of activations in that are bounded at every point on each compact interval (Locally essentially bounded activations with null discontinuity closure).
The universality theorem supplies pointwise compact-uniform density for pointwise locally bounded, nonpolynomial-almost-everywhere activations (Single-hidden-layer universal approximation).
Countable Choice is the explicit premise of the cited universality theorem (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
ReLU and logistic sigmoid are continuous, hence their discontinuity sets are empty; ReLU is bounded on each compact interval and sigmoid is globally bounded between zero and one. Thus both lie in the pointwise locally bounded activation class.
Neither is a polynomial almost everywhere. If a continuous function equals a polynomial almost everywhere on , their difference is continuous and must vanish everywhere, since any nonzero value would persist on an open interval of positive measure. ReLU vanishes on but is positive on ; the sigmoid is bounded and nonconstant. These properties exclude a polynomial identity for each.
Applying the pointwise branch of [F2] separately to each activation proves the stated compact-uniform approximation property. Both activations and their networks are continuous, so they are already Borel representatives when the theorem's clause is used. The theorem is an existence statement only and supplies no uniform width bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leshno, Lin, Pinkus, and Schocken, Multilayer Feedforward Networks With a Non-Polynomial Activation Function Can Approximate Any Function, Theorem 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville, Deep Learning, §6.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)