How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Root systems B_2 and C_2 from matrix Lie algebras
Example
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). For the symmetric matrix let the complex orthogonal Lie algebra of the symmetric bilinear form with Gram matrix (whose quadratic form is ), and for let the complex symplectic Lie algebra. Both are finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebras under the commutator bracket, and their diagonal subalgebras are Cartan subalgebras. Writing for the coordinate functionals on and for those on , the roots are for and for ; these are the root systems and , each with eight roots, and the assignment , carries bijectively onto , so .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; the matrix realizations and defined in the Example, their diagonal subalgebras , and the bracket formula for diagonal .
A Cartan subalgebra is nilpotent and self-normalizing; roots are the nonzero adjoint weights relative to it (Cartan subalgebra, Normalizer of a Lie subalgebra, Root and root space).
The Killing forms of and are nondegenerate, so Cartan's criterion makes both algebras semisimple (Classical simple Lie algebras and their Killing forms, Cartan's semisimplicity criterion).
The roots of a complex semisimple Lie algebra form a reduced crystallographic root system, and a linear bijection of root sets is a root-system isomorphism when it preserves all Cartan integers (Roots of a complex semisimple Lie algebra form a reduced crystallographic root system, Rank and isomorphism of root systems ↗).
Verification
The equations defining both matrix spaces are closed under commutators, and [L2] makes the resulting Lie algebras semisimple. Their displayed diagonal subalgebras are abelian. Choose and ; each has pairwise distinct diagonal entries. If normalizes the corresponding diagonal subalgebra, then or is diagonal, but a commutator with a diagonal matrix has zero diagonal and therefore vanishes. The matrix-unit bracket formula then makes diagonal, and the defining form equation places it in or . Thus each displayed subalgebra is nilpotent and self-normalizing, hence Cartan by [L1].
For , put . Its zero-weight space is , and its nonzero weight spaces are spanned by the nonzero vectors with and . Each is an -eigenvector of weight because and . Listing these weights gives ; the would-be weights correspond to , where the displayed vector is zero. Thus there are exactly eight roots, the set .
For , the form-compatible root vectors in the -blocks are and , of weights . The symmetric -block gives of weights , and the symmetric -block gives their three negative weights. Hence the roots are — exactly eight roots, the set .
By [L3], the two root sets computed in steps 2.1 and 2.2 are reduced crystallographic root systems. The linear map , carries the eight vectors of bijectively onto those of . Its two image basis vectors are orthogonal of squared length , so for all ; the common factor cancels from every Cartan integer. Thus [L3] makes a root-system isomorphism .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I, Lectures 19–24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Chapter II (standard reference, not scraped)