Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Roots of a complex semisimple Lie algebra form a reduced crystallographic root system

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let h be a Cartan subalgebra of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, with root set Φ=Φ(g,h) (Root and root space) and Cartan integers ⟨β,α∨⟩=β(hα) (Cartan integers are integers). Then:

(i) Φ is finite and g=h⊕⨁α∈Φgα with dim⁡gα=1; (ii) Φ spans h∗, and the common kernel {H∈h:α(H)=0 for all α∈Φ} is zero; (iii) Φ is reduced and central: if α,cα∈Φ for a scalar c, then c=±1, and −α∈Φ whenever α∈Φ; (iv) sα(β)∈Φ for all α,β∈Φ, for the reflections sα of Root reflection defined by a coroot; (v) ⟨β,α∨⟩=β(hα)∈Z for all α,β∈Φ.

Put hR=span⁡R{hα:α∈Φ} and E=span⁡RΦ. Then h=hR⊕ihR, restriction identifies E with the real dual of hR, and the Killing form induces a positive-definite inner product on E for which the displayed maps sα are orthogonal reflections. Consequently Φ⊂E is a reduced crystallographic root system. Under the Killing-form identification E≃hR, its Euclidean coroot 2α/(α,α) corresponds to the Lie-algebra coroot hα.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, such g and h, and the root set Φ.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it is inherited through [L1] and [L6].

[L1]

Φ is finite and g=h⊕⨁α∈Φgα is a direct sum of eigenspaces, with dim⁡gα=1 for each root (Root-space decomposition, Root and root space, Root spaces of a complex semisimple Lie algebra are one-dimensional).

[L2]

If α,cα∈Φ then c=±1; in particular the scalar multiples of a root that are roots are ±α (The only scalar multiples of a root that are roots are plus or minus the root).

[L3]

sα(β)∈Φ for all roots α,β (Root reflections preserve the root set, Root reflection defined by a coroot).

[L4]

β(hα)∈Z for all roots α,β (Cartan integers are integers, Coroot of a Lie-algebra root).

[L5]

−α∈Φ whenever α∈Φ, and gα pairs nondegenerately with g−α under the Killing form (Opposite root spaces pair nondegenerately).

[L7]

The restriction of the Killing form to h is nondegenerate, so every root α has a unique Killing-dual vector Hα with B(Hα,H)=α(H); moreover hα=2Hα/α(Hα) (Orthogonality of root spaces and nondegeneracy on the Cartan subalgebra, Killing-dual vector of a root, Coroot of a Lie-algebra root).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L3L4L5

Properties (i) and (v) are [L1] and [L4]; property (iii) is [L2] together with [L5], which also shows −α∈Φ; and (iv) is [L3].

1.2L1L6algebra

For (ii): if H∈h has α(H)=0 for every α∈Φ, then [H,gα]=α(H)gα=0 for every root and [H,h]=0 because h is abelian; by the direct sum of [L1] this gives [H,g]=0, so H is central and H=0 by [L6]. Hence the common kernel is zero, and therefore Φ spans h∗: a finite set of functionals spans the dual space exactly when no nonzero vector is annihilated by all of them, applied to the dual pairing between h and h∗.

2.1L4L7step 1.2algebra

Let hR=span⁡R{hα:α∈Φ}. The coroots span h over C: by step 1.2 the roots span h∗, their Killing-duals therefore span h, and [L7] says that each Hα is a nonzero complex multiple of hα. For H∈hR every root value β(H) is real, because it is a real linear combination of the integers β(hα) from [L4]. If also H∈ihR, every β(H) is both real and purely imaginary, hence zero; step 1.2 gives H=0. The complex spanning and this zero intersection prove h=hR⊕ihR as real vector spaces.

3.1L1L7step 1.2step 2.1algebra

For H,K∈hR, the root-space decomposition and one-dimensionality in [L1] give B(H,K)=tr⁡(ad⁡Had⁡K)=∑β∈Φβ(H)β(K)∈R. Thus B(H,H)=∑β∈Φβ(H)2≥0, and equality forces every β(H)=0, hence H=0 by step 1.2. Therefore B∣hR is positive definite. In particular B(hα,hα)=4/α(Hα)>0, so Hα is a positive real multiple of hα. It follows that the Killing-dual map sends E=span⁡RΦ isomorphically onto hR. Transporting B across that map defines a positive-definite inner product on E.

4.1A1L1L2L3L4L7step 3.1algebra∎

For the inner product of step 3.1, 2(β,α)/(α,α)=2B(Hβ,Hα)/B(Hα,Hα)=β(hα). Hence the map β↦β−β(hα)α of [L3] is precisely the orthogonal reflection in α⊥, and the Euclidean coroot maps to hα. Together with finiteness and spanning by the definition of E, [L2] gives reducedness, [L3] reflection stability, and [L4] crystallographic integrality. Thus Φ⊂E satisfies every reduced crystallographic root-system axiom, not merely properties (i)–(v). The Axiom of Choice is inherited through [L1], [L6], and [L7].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources