How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Root spaces of a complex semisimple Lie algebra are one-dimensional
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a root of a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra with respect to a Cartan subalgebra (Root and root space). Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, such and a root .
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it licenses the root triple, coroot, opposite-bracket, and root-decomposition facts in [L1]--[L3].
There is a triple , , with and (The root sl_2 triple, Coroot of a Lie-algebra root).
with for neither a root nor , and (Brackets of root spaces, Root-space decomposition).
for the corresponding dual vector (The bracket of opposite root spaces is the root line).
A trace of a commutator of finite-dimensional endomorphisms vanishes, (For and , ).
Proof
Put , a finite-dimensional subspace of containing . It is stable under by [L2] together with and from [L1]; it is stable under because with either or a negative multiple, by [L3], and ; and it is stable under because and , .
Since , the restriction of to the invariant subspace is a commutator of the restrictions of and , so its trace vanishes by [L4].
On the other hand acts on by the scalar , on by , and on the eigenspace , , by the scalar ; hence , that is, . As the summands are nonnegative integers, and for .
The argument is symmetric in and : the triple satisfies the same relations with in place of by [L1], and all the facts [L2]–[L4] are unchanged. Applying step 3.1 with therefore gives and for , which proves the statement.
Depends on
- The root sl_2 triple
- Coroot of a Lie-algebra root
- Brackets of root spaces
- The bracket of opposite root spaces is the root line
- Root-space decomposition
- Root and root space
- Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2
- The root-string property
- For $A\in M_{m\times n}(F)$ and $B\in M_{n\times m}(F)$, $\operatorname{tr}(AB)=\operatorname{tr}(BA)$
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- Dominant cyclic highest-weight presentation Definition
- Satake diagram Definition
- Vogan diagram Definition
- Root spaces can have arbitrary dimension in a complex semisimple Lie algebra False statement
- Chevalley basis and real structure constants Lemma
- Highest weight modules lie below the top weight Lemma
- Centralizer dimension from vanishing roots Proposition
- Dimension formula from roots Proposition
- The adjoint highest weight is the highest root Proposition
- The roots form a reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system Proposition
- Analytic and root-system Weyl groups agree Theorem
- Cayley transforms connect theta-stable Cartans in the classification Theorem
- Classification of real forms by Vogan diagrams Theorem
- Complexification dichotomy for a real simple lie algebra Theorem
- Existence of a compact real form Theorem
- Roots of a complex semisimple Lie algebra form a reduced crystallographic root system Theorem
- Semisimple compact groups up to isogeny Theorem
- Serre presentation theorem Theorem
- Vogan and Satake diagrams give equivalent real form classifications Theorem
- Vogan diagram for a fixed Cartan involution is well defined up to equivalence Theorem
- Weyl integration formula Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Chapter II (standard reference, not scraped)