Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The bracket of opposite root spaces is the root line

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let α be a root of the finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g with respect to a Cartan subalgebra h, and let Hαh be its Killing-dual vector (Killing-dual vector of a root). Then [gα,gα]=CHα.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, such g,h and a root α, with Killing form B.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it licenses the root decomposition, Killing-dual vector, and opposite-root pairing in [L1]--[L3].

[L1]

[gα,gα]g0, where g0 is the simultaneous zero-weight space, and g=hγΦgγ is a direct sum (Root and root space, Brackets of root spaces, Root-space decomposition).

[L2]

B is invariant and Bh is nondegenerate; B(Hα,H)=α(H) for all Hh (Trace forms are symmetric and invariant, Orthogonality of root spaces and nondegeneracy on the Cartan subalgebra, Killing-dual vector of a root, Killing form).

[L3]

The pairing gα×gαC given by B is nondegenerate (Opposite root spaces pair nondegenerately).

[L4]

A Cartan subalgebra of a complex semisimple Lie algebra is maximal toral, and a toral subalgebra is abelian (Cartan subalgebras are exactly maximal toral subalgebras, Toral and maximal toral subalgebras).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

We first prove that the zero-weight space in [L1] is h. By [L4], h is abelian, so hg0. Conversely, if xg0, write x=H0+γΦxγ by [L1]. For every Hh, directness and 0=[H,x]=γγ(H)xγ imply γ(H)xγ=0 for every root γ. Since each γ is a nonzero functional, every xγ vanishes; hence x=H0h and g0=h. In particular [L1] gives [gα,gα]h.

A1L1L4algebra
2.1

Let egα, fgα and Hh. By step 1.1, [e,f]h, and invariance [L2] together with [f,H]=α(H)f gives B([e,f],H)=B(e,[f,H])=α(H)B(e,f)=B(B(e,f)Hα,H). Nondegeneracy of Bh yields [e,f]=B(e,f)Hα, so every such bracket lies in CHα. By [L3] some e,f have B(e,f)0; then their bracket is nonzero because Hα0 by Killing-dual vector of a root. Therefore the bracket is exactly CHα.

A1L2L3step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources