How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is split over the rationals
Example
The three irreducible complex representations of are already defined over : the trivial representation, the sign representation, and the two-dimensional standard representation on by permutation of coordinates. Hence is a splitting field for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The natural coordinate-permutation action of on .
The simple modules of , for any field , are the two one-dimensional factor modules and the two-dimensional column module (Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings).
The trivial and sign representations are defined over every field of characteristic zero (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets, The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup).
Verification
The line is trivial and its invariant complement has dimension two. With and as a basis of , the transposition and cycle act by and . In particular has no eigenvalue over .
Every one-dimensional complex representation of is trivial or sign: conjugate transpositions have one common image with , and every -cycle is a product of two transpositions, so acts as . A proper invariant line in would therefore be fixed by , contrary to step 1.1. Thus and are irreducible.
The two central averages and act respectively as and under the algebra map defined by the three displayed representations; they kill because has neither a trivial nor a sign line. The four matrices are linearly independent over (their coordinate determinant is ), so the -projection of is all . The central averages separate the scalar factors, making surjective; both sides have dimension , hence is an isomorphism.
Tensoring step 3.1 with gives . By [L1] over both fields, the three displayed models are all irreducibles over and . Each simple module of has endomorphism ring : this is immediate for the scalar factors, while an endomorphism of the column module commuting with every matrix unit is scalar. The splitting-field definition therefore makes a splitting field for .
Depends on
- The finite symmetric group $S_n$, one-line notation, and cycle notation
- The sign representation of $S_n$ and the restriction $\operatorname{Res}^G_H(V)$ of a representation to a subgroup
- The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite $G$-sets
- Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings
- A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gabor Wiese, Galois Representations, Section 2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)