How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Schur Indices and Fields of Definition — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artin Induction and Rational Characters
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Brauer Induction and Elementary Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schur Indices and Fields of Definition
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples separate the character field from a field of definition. The cyclic and symmetric-group cases have rational models, while the faithful quaternion character is rational-valued but needs multiplicity two over the rationals.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The two nontrivial characters of form one rational representation
Example
For and , the characters and are Galois conjugate. Their sum is afforded over by the action of on with matrix Thus the rational Galois orbit occurs with multiplicity one; in particular the Schur index of either character over its character field is one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and as displayed.
Over a nonsplitting field, an irreducible character orbit occurs with its Schur-index multiplicity (Character formula over a nonsplitting field).
Verification
The displayed matrix has characteristic polynomial , hence eigenvalues , and its cube is the identity. It therefore gives a rational -representation with complex character .
The orbit appears once, so [L1] identifies its scalar-extension multiplicity over as . Since the one-dimensional character itself is defined over , its Schur index over its character field is also .
is split over the rationals
Example
The three irreducible complex representations of are already defined over : the trivial representation, the sign representation, and the two-dimensional standard representation on by permutation of coordinates. Hence is a splitting field for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The natural coordinate-permutation action of on .
The number of irreducible complex representations of is its number of conjugacy classes, namely three (If is algebraically closed and , the number of irreducible representations of equals the number of conjugacy classes).
The trivial and sign representations are defined over every field of characteristic zero (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets, The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup).
Verification
The line is trivial and its invariant complement has dimension two. A transposition has trace on , while a -cycle has trace ; thus is neither trivial nor sign.
The three displayed rational models have distinct complex characters, and [L1] says there are no further irreducibles. Therefore every complex irreducible has a rational model, which is exactly that is splitting for .
The faithful quaternion character has Schur index two
Example
For , its faithful complex irreducible character has values , , and . It is rational-valued, but .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with generators satisfying and .
The Schur index is the common scalar-extension multiplicity of the complex constituents of an irreducible representation over the character field (The Schur index of an irreducible character).
Verification
In the usual complex model, and have eigenvalues , so their traces, and those of their negatives, are ; acts as . Hence the displayed character is rational-valued.
Let and let act on it by left multiplication. The norm is nonzero for every nonzero rational quaternion, so is a division algebra. A -stable rational subspace is therefore a left ideal (the elements of span ), and this four-dimensional rational representation is irreducible.
The trace of left multiplication is at , at , and at the other six elements. Thus the complexification of the irreducible rational representation in step 1.2 has character (equivalently, is two copies of the natural module under left multiplication). By [L1], its common scalar-extension multiplicity is .
The trivial character has Schur index one
Example
For every finite group , the trivial character has character field and Schur index .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and its one-dimensional trivial complex representation.
The Schur index is the least positive multiplicity with a model over the character field (Schur index as minimal realization multiplicity).
Verification
Every value of is , so its character field is . The one-dimensional representation on in which every element acts as is a -model.
Thus multiplicity is attainable, and [L1] makes the Schur index .