How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Schur index as minimal realization multiplicity
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be an irreducible complex character of a finite group and put . Its Schur index is the least positive integer for which the character is afforded by a -representation. Consequently itself is realizable over if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an irreducible complex character , and .
The irreducible -representation in the Schur-index definition has scalar extension , where affords (The Schur index of an irreducible character, Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation).
A field of definition means a -model whose complex scalar extension is equivalent to the given representation (Character fields and fields of definition).
Under ZFC, simple -modules correspond bijectively to Galois orbits of simple modules after extension to the chosen finite splitting field. Thus occurs after scalar extension of exactly one irreducible -module, namely the module in [L1] (Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change).
Every finite-dimensional -representation of is completely reducible (If , every finite-dimensional representation of is completely reducible).
Finite-dimensional complex representations of are determined by their characters (Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters).
Proof
Under the stated AC premise, let be the irreducible -representation from the Schur-index definition. By [L1], its scalar extension has character , so is afforded over .
Conversely, if is afforded by a -representation , [L4] decomposes into irreducible -summands, while [L5] identifies its complex scalar extension with . By [L3], every summand that contributes is isomorphic to , and by [L1] each copy contributes with multiplicity . Hence .
Step 1.1 attains and step 1.2 excludes every smaller positive , so this is the least such multiplicity. With , [L2] gives exactly the stated realizability criterion.
Depends on
- Character fields and fields of definition
- The Schur index of an irreducible character
- Galois orbits classify simple modules after splitting base change
- Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation
- If $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, every finite-dimensional representation of $G$ is completely reducible
- Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gabor Wiese, Galois Representations, Definition 2.5.12 through Remark 2.5.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Weizhe Zheng, Lectures on Algebra, Corollary 4.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)