Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

10 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Schur Indices and Fields of Definition

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

For a finite group in characteristic zero, character values need not determine a field in which matrices can be chosen. The Schur index measures precisely this failure of descent: it is the common multiplicity in the Galois orbit after scalar extension, the index of an endomorphism division algebra, and the least multiplicity that becomes realizable over the character field.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Character fields and fields of definition

Definition

Let G be finite and let χ be the character of a complex representation of G. Its character field is Q(χ):=Q({χ(g):gG})C. More generally, if FC, write F(χ) for the field generated by F and the values of χ in the sense of Field extensions, generated subrings F[S], generated subfields F(S), and simple extensions.

If FC, a complex representation ρ:GGL(V) is realizable over F, and F is a field of definition for ρ, when there is a finite-dimensional representation ρF:GGL(W) over F such that CFW is equivalent to V. Thus a character field records traces, whereas a field of definition records a matrix model; neither term asserts that the other field has the other property.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Galois conjugates of a representation

Definition

Let E/F be finite Galois, let G be a group, and let V be an E-representation with matrices ρ(g) in an E-basis. For σGal(E/F), the σ-conjugate σV is the E-representation whose matrix for g is obtained by applying σ entrywise to ρ(g). This does not depend on the chosen basis up to equivalence: conjugating every entry of Aρ(g)A1 gives σ(A)σ(ρ(g))σ(A)1.

Its character is χσV=σχV. We write Stab(V) for the subgroup of Galois automorphisms for which σVV.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Base change for intertwiner spaces

Statement

Let E/F be a field extension, G a group, and V,W finite-dimensional F-representations of G. The map EFHomG(V,W)HomG(EFV,EFW),af((bv)abf(v)) is an E-linear isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E/F, G, V, and W as in the statement.

[L1]

Extension of scalars sends an F-linear map f to 1Ef (Restriction of scalars and extension of scalars SRM along a ring homomorphism RS).

[L2]

An intertwiner is exactly a linear map satisfying fρV(g)=ρW(g)f for every gG (Intertwiners, the spaces HomG(V,W) and EndG(V), equivalent representations, and faithful representations).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose F-bases of V and W. By [L2], HomG(V,W) is the simultaneous kernel in HomF(V,W) of the maps ffρV(g)ρW(g)f.

L2choose
2.1

Tensoring a kernel of maps between finite-dimensional F-spaces with the field E preserves that kernel, because tensoring with a field extension is exact. The simultaneous kernel after tensoring is, by [L2], precisely HomG(EFV,EFW).

L2step 1.1
3.1

The resulting identification sends af to the displayed map, which agrees with [L1]. Therefore it is the asserted E-linear isomorphism.

L1step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Galois conjugates have equal scalar-extension multiplicity

Statement

Let E/F be finite Galois of characteristic 0, let G be finite, and let V be a finite-dimensional F-representation. If U is an irreducible constituent of EFV, then every σU is a constituent with the same multiplicity as U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E/F, G, V, and U as in the statement.

[L1]

In characteristic not dividing G, finite-dimensional representations of G are completely reducible (If charkG, every finite-dimensional representation of G is completely reducible).

[L2]

Galois conjugation applies an automorphism entrywise and preserves equivalence (Galois conjugates of a representation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], write EFVXmXX as a direct sum over its irreducible constituents.

L1given
2.1

Apply σ entrywise to this decomposition. Since the matrices of V have entries in F, [L2] identifies the conjugate of the left side with itself, while the right side becomes XmXσX.

L2step 1.1
3.1

Uniqueness of multiplicities in a completely reducible decomposition now gives mσU=mU, as required.

L1step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation

Statement

Let F be characteristic 0, G finite, E/F finite Galois and a splitting field for G, and V an irreducible F-representation. Then there are an absolutely irreducible constituent U of EFV and an integer m1 such that EFVmσGal(E/F)/Stab(U)σU. The displayed summands are pairwise inequivalent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F, G, E, V as in the statement.

[L1]

E being a splitting field means every irreducible E-representation has only scalar G-endomorphisms (A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring).

[L2]

Intertwiner spaces commute with extension of scalars (Base change for intertwiner spaces).

[L3]

The conjugates of any constituent of EFV have equal multiplicities (Galois conjugates have equal scalar-extension multiplicity).

[L4]

Every finite-dimensional E-representation of G is completely reducible (If charkG, every finite-dimensional representation of G is completely reducible).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L4], decompose EFV into irreducibles and choose a constituent U. The Galois action permutes its isomorphism classes.

L4choose
2.1

Let X be the sum of the isotypic components in the Galois orbit of U. The canonical semilinear Γ=Gal(E/F)-action on EFV preserves X. To make descent explicit, choose trace-dual F-bases (xi) and (yi) of E. For wX, every T(yiw)=σΓσ(yiw) lies in XΓ, and the separability identity ixiσ(yi)=δσ,1 gives w=ixiT(yiw). Hence X=EFXΓ. Under (EFV)Γ=V, the G-stable space XΓ is an F-subrepresentation of V; irreducibility therefore forces X=EFV.

givenstep 1.1algebra
3.1

By [L3], every member of this orbit has one common multiplicity m. The orbit is indexed without repetition by Gal(E/F)/Stab(U), which gives the formula.

L3step 2.1
4.1

Let E be an algebraic closure of E. For any irreducible constituent U, [L1] and [L2] give EndG(EEU)EEEndG(U)=E. The scalar extension is semisimple by [L4]; if it were reducible, projection onto a proper summand would be a nonscalar endomorphism. Hence U is absolutely irreducible. Distinct orbit points are inequivalent by the definition of the stabilizer.

L1L2L4step 3.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The character field is the stabilizer fixed field

Statement

Let FEC with E/F finite Galois, let G be finite, and let U be an absolutely irreducible E-representation with character χ. Then EStab(U)=F(χ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: FEC, G, U, and χ as in the statement.

[L1]

χσU=σχ, and Stab(U) consists of conjugates equivalent to U (Galois conjugates of a representation).

[L2]

Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are equivalent exactly when their characters agree (Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters).

[L3]

For a finite Galois extension, intermediate fields are fixed fields of their fixing subgroups (The fundamental theorem of finite Galois theory).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For σGal(E/F), [L1] and [L2] give σStab(U)σ(χ(g))=χ(g) for every gG.

L1L2algebra
2.1

The right side says exactly that σ fixes the field generated by F and all character values, namely F(χ).

L1step 1.1
3.1

Thus Stab(U)=Gal(E/F(χ)); [L3] gives EStab(U)=F(χ).

L3step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The endomorphism division algebra of an irreducible representation

Definition

For an irreducible finite-dimensional F-representation V of G, put DV:=EndF[G](V)=EndG(V). Schur's lemma says that every nonzero member of this endomorphism ring is invertible, so DV is a division ring (Schur's lemma for irreducible representations: a nonzero intertwiner is an isomorphism, and EndG(V) is a division ring). We call it the endomorphism division algebra of V. Scalars give a central embedding FDV.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Absolute irreducibility via the endomorphism division algebra

Statement

Let F have characteristic 0, G be finite, and V be an irreducible finite-dimensional F-representation. Then V is absolutely irreducible if and only if DV=F (via scalar endomorphisms).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F, G, and V as in the statement.

[L1]

Base change gives EFDVEndG(EFV) for every field extension E/F (Base change for intertwiner spaces).

[L2]

Over a finite splitting field, scalar extension of V is a common multiple of one Galois orbit of absolutely irreducible constituents (Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a finite splitting field E/F. If V is absolutely irreducible, then EFV is irreducible, so its endomorphism algebra is E. By [L1], EFDVE, and comparing F-dimensions gives DV=F.

L1choose
1.2

Conversely assume DV=F. Then [L1] makes EndG(EFV) one-dimensional over E.

L1given
2.1

In the decomposition of [L2], either a multiplicity exceeds one or two inequivalent constituents occur whenever EFV is reducible; either case supplies a non-scalar projection endomorphism. This contradicts step 1.2, so EFV is irreducible and V is absolutely irreducible.

L2step 1.2
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Schur index of an irreducible character

Definition

Let χ be an irreducible complex character of a finite group G, put K=Q(χ), and choose a finite cyclotomic splitting field E/K; thus KEC and E/K is finite Galois. Proposition 4.3.2 in the cited notes of Zheng says that, as V ranges over the irreducible K-representations, the absolutely irreducible constituents of EKV form a complete, nonrepeating list of the irreducible E-representations, grouped into Galois orbits. Consequently there is a unique irreducible K-representation V, up to isomorphism, whose scalar extension contains a representation affording χ. In the decomposition from Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation, write its common multiplicity as m. The Schur index of χ over K is mK(χ):=m. The next lemma proves that enlarging the chosen finite Galois splitting field does not change this integer; that is why this is a definition rather than an auxiliary choice.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Schur index is independent of the splitting field

Statement

For an irreducible character χ of a finite group, the common multiplicity in the scalar-extension orbit used in The Schur index of an irreducible character is unchanged when the finite Galois splitting field is replaced by a larger finite Galois splitting field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: K=Q(χ), an irreducible K-module V attached to χ, and finite Galois splitting fields EL over K.

[L1]

Scalar extension is associative: LKVLE(EKV) (Change of rings: NRMNS(SRM)).

[L2]

Over either splitting field, an irreducible K-module extends as one Galois orbit with a common multiplicity (Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write EKV as m times its orbit of pairwise inequivalent absolutely irreducible constituents, using [L2].

L2given
2.1

Each constituent remains irreducible after extension from E to the splitting field L, and distinct constituents remain distinct; therefore [L1] writes LKV with the same coefficient m.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Applying [L2] directly over L identifies its common multiplicity with that coefficient. Hence both choices give m, proving independence.

L2step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Character formula over a nonsplitting field

Statement

Let FEC, let V be an irreducible F-representation of a finite group G, and let E/F be finite Galois and a splitting field for G. Let χ be the character of one absolutely irreducible constituent of EFV, let m be that constituent's multiplicity in EFV, and put H=Stab(χ). Then χV=mσGal(E/F)/Hσχ. In particular, dimFV=m[F(χ):F]χ(1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: FEC, G, V, χ, m, and H as in the statement.

[L1]

Scalar extension of V is m times the orbit of χ's representation (Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation).

[L2]

The character of a direct sum is the sum of the characters (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).

[L3]

The fixed field of the stabilizer is F(χ) (The character field is the stabilizer fixed field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L2], taking characters of the scalar-extension decomposition gives the displayed character identity.

L1L2
2.1

Evaluating that identity at 1G gives dimFV=m[Gal(E/F):H]χ(1).

step 1.1algebra
3.1

By [L3] and the finite Galois correspondence, the index [Gal(E/F):H] equals [F(χ):F]. Substitute this into step 2.1.

L3step 2.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Schur index divides the representation degree

Statement

Let χ be an irreducible complex character, put K=Q(χ), and let V be the irreducible K-representation used in The Schur index of an irreducible character. Then mK(χ)dimKV.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: χ, K, and V as in the statement, together with a finite Galois splitting field E/K inside C.

[L1]

dimKV=mK(χ)[K(χ):K],χ(1) (Character formula over a nonsplitting field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since K(χ)=K, [L1] gives dimKV=mK(χ)χ(1). The integer χ(1) is positive, so this expresses dimKV as an integer multiple of mK(χ).

L1algebra
2.1

Hence mK(χ)dimKV.

step 1.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Index of a central division algebra

Definition

Let D be a finite-dimensional division algebra whose centre is the field K. Then [D:K] is a square. Its positive square root ind(D):=[D:K] is the index (or degree) of D. Equivalently, every maximal subfield L has [L:K]=ind(D) and splits D. This convention applies only to central finite-dimensional division algebras.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The Schur index equals the division-algebra index

Statement

Let χ be an irreducible complex character of a finite group G, put K=Q(χ), and let V be the irreducible K-representation used in The Schur index of an irreducible character. If DV=EndG(V), then Z(DV)=K and mK(χ)=ind(DV).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: χ, K, V, and DV as in the statement, and a finite Galois splitting field E/K inside C.

[L1]

Base change identifies EKDV with EndG(EKV) (Base change for intertwiner spaces).

[L2]

The scalar-extension decomposition is EKVUmK(χ) for an absolutely irreducible U with character χ (Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation, The character field is the stabilizer fixed field).

[L3]

The index of a central division algebra is the square root of its central dimension (Index of a central division algebra).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L2] and [L4], EndG(EKV)EndG(UmK(χ))MmK(χ)(E). Thus [L1] gives EKDVMmK(χ)(E).

L1L2L4
2.1

If zZ(DV), its image in the matrix algebra of step 1.1 commutes with every matrix, so it is λI for some λE. Because 1z is fixed by Gal(E/K), so is λ; hence λK. Since K already acts by scalar endomorphisms, Z(DV)=K.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Taking E-dimensions in step 1.1 gives dimKDV=mK(χ)2. With step 2.1, [L3] therefore gives ind(DV)=mK(χ).

L3step 1.1step 2.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Schur index as minimal realization multiplicity

Statement

Let χ be an irreducible complex character of a finite group and put K=Q(χ). Its Schur index mK(χ) is the least positive integer r for which the character rχ is afforded by a K-representation. Consequently χ itself is realizable over K if and only if mK(χ)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An irreducible complex character χ and K=Q(χ).

[L1]

The irreducible K-representation in the Schur-index definition has scalar extension mK(χ)U, where U affords χ (The Schur index of an irreducible character, Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation).

[L2]

A field of definition means a K-model whose complex scalar extension is equivalent to the given representation (Character fields and fields of definition).

[L3]

Proposition 4.3.2 in the cited notes of Zheng partitions all irreducible representations over a splitting field according to the unique irreducible K-representation from which they arise. Thus U occurs after scalar extension of exactly one irreducible K-module, namely the module V in [L1].

[L4]

Every finite-dimensional K-representation of G is completely reducible (If charkG, every finite-dimensional representation of G is completely reducible).

[L5]

Finite-dimensional complex representations of G are determined by their characters (Finite-dimensional complex representations of a finite group are determined up to isomorphism by their characters).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let V be the irreducible K-representation from the Schur-index definition. By [L1], its scalar extension has character mK(χ)χ, so mK(χ)χ is afforded over K.

L1given
1.2

Conversely, if rχ is afforded by a K-representation W, [L4] decomposes W into irreducible K-summands, while [L5] identifies its complex scalar extension with Ur. By [L3], every summand that contributes U is isomorphic to V, and by [L1] each copy contributes U with multiplicity mK(χ). Hence mK(χ)r.

L1L3L4L5givenalgebra
2.1

Step 1.1 attains r=mK(χ) and step 1.2 excludes every smaller positive r, so this is the least such multiplicity. With r=1, [L2] gives exactly the stated realizability criterion.

L2step 1.1step 1.2

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources