Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation

Statement

Let F be characteristic 0, G finite, E/F finite Galois and a splitting field for G, and V an irreducible F-representation. Then there are an absolutely irreducible constituent U of EFV and an integer m1 such that EFVmσGal(E/F)/Stab(U)σU. The displayed summands are pairwise inequivalent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F, G, E, V as in the statement.

[L1]

E being a splitting field means every irreducible E-representation has only scalar G-endomorphisms (A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring).

[L2]

Intertwiner spaces commute with extension of scalars (Base change for intertwiner spaces).

[L3]

The conjugates of any constituent of EFV have equal multiplicities (Galois conjugates have equal scalar-extension multiplicity).

[L4]

Every finite-dimensional E-representation of G is completely reducible (If charkG, every finite-dimensional representation of G is completely reducible).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L4], decompose EFV into irreducibles and choose a constituent U. The Galois action permutes its isomorphism classes.

L4choose
2.1

Let X be the sum of the isotypic components in the Galois orbit of U. The canonical semilinear Γ=Gal(E/F)-action on EFV preserves X. To make descent explicit, choose trace-dual F-bases (xi) and (yi) of E. For wX, every T(yiw)=σΓσ(yiw) lies in XΓ, and the separability identity ixiσ(yi)=δσ,1 gives w=ixiT(yiw). Hence X=EFXΓ. Under (EFV)Γ=V, the G-stable space XΓ is an F-subrepresentation of V; irreducibility therefore forces X=EFV.

givenstep 1.1algebra
3.1

By [L3], every member of this orbit has one common multiplicity m. The orbit is indexed without repetition by Gal(E/F)/Stab(U), which gives the formula.

L3step 2.1
4.1

Let E be an algebraic closure of E. For any irreducible constituent U, [L1] and [L2] give EndG(EEU)EEEndG(U)=E. The scalar extension is semisimple by [L4]; if it were reducible, projection onto a proper summand would be a nonscalar endomorphism. Hence U is absolutely irreducible. Distinct orbit points are inequivalent by the definition of the stabilizer.

L1L2L4step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources