How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scalar extension of an irreducible finite-group representation
Statement
Let be characteristic , finite, finite Galois and a splitting field for , and an irreducible -representation. Then there are an absolutely irreducible constituent of and an integer such that The displayed summands are pairwise inequivalent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , as in the statement.
being a splitting field means every irreducible -representation has only scalar -endomorphisms (A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring).
Intertwiner spaces commute with extension of scalars (Base change for intertwiner spaces).
The conjugates of any constituent of have equal multiplicities (Galois conjugates have equal scalar-extension multiplicity).
Every finite-dimensional -representation of is completely reducible (If , every finite-dimensional representation of is completely reducible).
Proof
By [L4], decompose into irreducibles and choose a constituent . The Galois action permutes its isomorphism classes.
Let be the sum of the isotypic components in the Galois orbit of . The canonical semilinear -action on preserves . To make descent explicit, choose trace-dual -bases and of . For , every lies in , and the separability identity gives . Hence . Under , the -stable space is an -subrepresentation of ; irreducibility therefore forces .
By [L3], every member of this orbit has one common multiplicity . The orbit is indexed without repetition by , which gives the formula.
Let be an algebraic closure of . For any irreducible constituent , [L1] and [L2] give The scalar extension is semisimple by [L4]; if it were reducible, projection onto a proper summand would be a nonscalar endomorphism. Hence is absolutely irreducible. Distinct orbit points are inequivalent by the definition of the stabilizer.
Depends on
- A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring
- Galois conjugates of a representation
- Base change for intertwiner spaces
- Galois conjugates have equal scalar-extension multiplicity
- If $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, every finite-dimensional representation of $G$ is completely reducible
Used by
- The Schur index of an irreducible character Definition
- The character field is the stabilizer fixed field Lemma
- The Schur index is independent of the splitting field Lemma
- Absolute irreducibility via the endomorphism division algebra Theorem
- Character formula over a nonsplitting field Theorem
- Schur index as minimal realization multiplicity Theorem
- The Schur index equals the division-algebra index Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gabor Wiese, Galois Representations, Proposition 2.2.11 and Corollary 2.2.12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Weizhe Zheng, Lectures on Algebra, Proposition 4.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)