How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Absolute irreducibility via the endomorphism division algebra
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let have characteristic , be finite, and be an irreducible finite-dimensional -representation. Then is absolutely irreducible if and only if (via scalar endomorphisms).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and as in the statement, and the Axiom of Choice.
The stated Axiom of Choice is the direct premise used to obtain an algebraic closure (The Axiom of Choice).
Base change gives for every field extension (Base change for intertwiner spaces).
Assuming Choice, has an algebraic closure (Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure).
Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar (Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar).
Since the characteristic is zero, every finite-dimensional representation of the finite group over any extension field of is completely reducible (If , every finite-dimensional representation of is completely reducible).
Proof
If is absolutely irreducible, then is irreducible for an algebraic closure supplied by [L2] under [A1]. By [L3] its endomorphism algebra is , and [L1] gives . Since is finite-dimensional, comparison of -dimensions gives . The scalar copy of in is therefore all of .
Conversely assume , and let be any field extension. By [L1], , so every -endomorphism is scalar. By [L4], is completely reducible.
If were reducible, complete reducibility would split it into two nonzero -subrepresentations. Projection onto one would be a nonzero, nonidentity idempotent -endomorphism and therefore could not be scalar over the field , contradicting step 1.2. Thus is irreducible for every extension , which is absolute irreducibility.
Depends on
- The endomorphism division algebra of an irreducible representation
- Base change for intertwiner spaces
- Assuming Choice, every field has an algebraic closure
- Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar
- If $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, every finite-dimensional representation of $G$ is completely reducible
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gabor Wiese, Galois Representations, Theorem 2.3.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Weizhe Zheng, Lectures on Algebra, Theorem 4.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)