Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An exact three-node inviscid-versus-viscous SBP entropy budget

Example

Take d=1, R=1, γ=2, cv=1, s0=0, and three periodic nodes with H=I3 and

D=12(01−1−1011−10).

Use states U1=(1,0,1), U2=(1,0,2), and U3=(1,0,1). The Euler-only entropy-conservative operator has zero total mathematical-entropy rate at this state; adding the model viscous term gives the exact rate −κ/8.

Verification

Given: The three-node data above, κ>0, the SBP flux-differencing formula, and the entropy-variable viscous block.

[F1] Periodic diagonal-norm SBP compressible viscous scheme: the Euler term is 2DFec(Ui,Uℓ), the viscous term is D(K11(Ui)(Dv)i), and the periodic grid satisfies DT=−D and D1=0.

[F2] Properties of the explicit entropy-conservative flux: Fec(Ui,Uℓ)=Fec(Uℓ,Ui) and (vℓ−vi)TFec(Ui,Uℓ)=ψ(Uℓ)−ψ(Ui).

[F3] Positive-semidefinite entropy-variable factorization of viscous flux: the one-dimensional nodal viscous entropy production is 2μT∣G0∣2+ζT(tr⁡G)2+κT2(DvE)2.

[F4] Strict convexity and entropy variables for the ideal-gas Euler flux: v=∇Uη, vm=u/T, and vE=−1/T.

1.1F1givenalgebra

The displayed D is skew-symmetric, and each row sums to zero, so with H=I3 it satisfies [F1]. The states have ρi=1, pi=Ei>0, and Ti=Ei, hence are admissible.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Formula [F4] gives vE=(−1,−1/2,−1) and vm=(0,0,0). Multiplication by D gives DvE=(1/4,0,−1/4) and Dvm=0. Since ui=0, the strain array G in [F3] vanishes at every node.

2.2F1F2F4step 1.1algebra

By [F4] and the chain rule, the Euler-only operator has entropy derivative −2∑i,ℓDiℓviTFec(Ui,Uℓ). Skew-symmetry and [F2] rewrite this as −∑i,ℓDiℓ(ψ(Ui)−ψ(Uℓ))=0, since both row and column sums of D vanish.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For the viscous term, [F4] and matrix skew-symmetry give the entropy derivative vTDW=−(Dv)TW=−∑i(Dvi)TK11(Ui)(Dvi) for the nodal flux array Wi=K11(Ui)(Dv)i. The zero strain and T=(1,2,1) from step 1.1 reduce [F3] to −κ∑iTi2(DvE,i)2=−κ(1/16+0+1/16)=−κ/8. Thus adding viscosity changes the Euler-only rate from zero to the stated negative value.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources