Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict convexity and entropy variables for the ideal-gas Euler flux

Statement

For the ideal-gas model in Ideal-gas compressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier model, the mathematical entropy η=−ρs has positive-definite Hessian on G. Its entropy variables are

v(U)=∇Uη(U)=(cvγ−s−β∣u∣22, βu, −β),β=cvρε=1T.

The Euler entropy flux qj(U)=η(U)uj is compatible with Fj, meaning ∇Uqj=(∇Uη)TDFj, and its entropy potential is ψj(U)=v(U)TFj(U)−qj(U)=ρRuj. Consequently U↦v(U) is a local diffeomorphism at every U∈G and η is strictly convex on G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, R>0, γ>1, cv=R/(γ−1), s0∈R, and an admissible state U=(ρ,m,E)∈G with the thermodynamic functions defined in the model item.

[F1]

Ideal-gas compressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier model: ε=E−∣m∣2/(2ρ)>0, u=m/ρ, p=(γ−1)ε, T=p/(Rρ), s=cvlog⁡(p/ργ)+s0, η=−ρs, Fj=(ρuj,muj+pej,(E+p)uj), and qj=ηuj.

[F2]

The ideal-gas admissible state set is open and convex: G is open and convex, with ρ>0 and E>∣m∣2/(2ρ).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Set ε=E−∣m∣2/(2ρ) and u=m/ρ. Rewriting the entropy gives η=−cvρlog⁡((γ−1)ε)+cvγρlog⁡ρ−s0ρ. For an increment δU=(a,b,c), its first internal-energy variation is δε=c−u⋅b+∣u∣2a/2, and its second directional variation is D2ε[δU,δU]=−∣b−ua∣2/ρ. The chain rule therefore yields D2η[δU,δU]=cv(γρa2−2εa δε+ρε2(δε)2+1ε∣b−ua∣2). The first three terms have matrix (γ/ρ−1/ε−1/ερ/ε2), whose leading diagonal entry is positive and determinant is (γ−1)/ε2>0. The last term is nonnegative. If the full quadratic form is zero, then a=δε=0 and b=0; the formula for δε then gives c=0. Thus the Hessian is positive definite.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Differentiating the same expression for η gives β=cvρ/ε=1/T and v=(cvγ−s−β∣u∣2/2,βu,−β). Positive definiteness from step 1.1 makes DUv=DU2η invertible, so the inverse function theorem gives a smooth local inverse near each state. Since G is convex by [F2], integrating the positive Hessian along the segment between any two distinct states also gives strict convexity of η on G.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Fix j and an arbitrary variation dU=(dρ,dm,dE), and write duj=(dmj−uj dρ)/ρ. Differentiating the flux in [F1] gives dFj=(ujdρ+ρduj, ujdm+m duj+ejdp, uj(dE+dp)+(E+p)duj). With vm=βu and vE=−β from step 2.1, the dp terms in vTdFj−ujvTdU cancel, and the coefficient of duj is ρvρ+βρ∣u∣2−β(E+p)=−ρs=η, using E=ε+ρ∣u∣2/2, p=(γ−1)ε, and βε=cvρ. Thus vTdFj=ujvTdU+η duj=dqj for every variation, proving ∇Uqj=vTDFj directly.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Direct substitution of v, Fj, and qj gives vTFj−qj=(ρ(cvγ−s−β∣u∣2/2)+βρ∣u∣2−βE+ρs)uj. Using E=ε+ρ∣u∣2/2 and βε=cvρ, the coefficient simplifies to cv(γ−1)ρ=Rρ. This proves ψj=ρRuj and completes the stated entropy-pair and potential identities.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources