Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second-order face-flux consistency for the one-dimensional viscous operator

Statement

Let U∈C3([0,L],G) have image in a compact subset of G. On the uniform mesh in One-dimensional orthogonal finite-volume viscous scheme, sample Ui=U(xi). For every interior face xi+1/2, the defined viscous face flux satisfies

∣Gi+1/2−K11(U(xi+1/2)) ∂xv(U(xi+1/2))∣≤Ch2,

for all sufficiently small h, where C depends on U, the fixed physical parameters, and the compact positive-state set, but not on i or h. This is a face-flux consistency estimate only; it asserts no mesh-uniform solution error bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L>0, a C3 field U:[0,L]→G whose image lies in a compact subset of G, and the uniform cell centers and face flux formula of One-dimensional orthogonal finite-volume viscous scheme.

[F1]

One-dimensional orthogonal finite-volume viscous scheme: Ui+1/2=(Ui+Ui+1)/2 and Gi+1/2=K11(Ui+1/2)(v(Ui+1)−v(Ui))/h.

[F2]

Positive-semidefinite entropy-variable factorization of viscous flux: K11(U) is the smooth state block representing the one-direction viscous flux K11(U)∂xv on G.

[F3]

Strict convexity and entropy variables for the ideal-gas Euler flux: v=(cvγ−s−β∣u∣2/2,βu,−β), where β=cvρ/ε=1/T.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Fix an interior face xf=xi+1/2 and put Uf=U(xf). Taylor's theorem at xf gives U(xf±h/2)=Uf±(h/2)U′(xf)+(h2/8)U′′(xf)+O(h3), uniformly in the face index because U′′′ is bounded. Averaging the two expansions and using [F1] yields Ui+1/2=Uf+O(h2).

1.2F3givenalgebra

In [F3], u=m/ρ, ε=E−∣m∣2/(2ρ), and s=cvlog⁡((γ−1)ε/ργ)+s0. These functions and β are smooth on G, where ρ,ε>0, so v∘U is C3 on [0,L] with bounded third derivative. Its centered Taylor expansion gives (v(U(xf+h/2))−v(U(xf−h/2)))/h=∂xv(Uf)+O(h2) uniformly in i.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The block K11(U) is smooth on G by its explicit finite-dimensional factorization [F2], hence has bounded first derivatives on a compact neighborhood of the image of U. Step 1.1 gives K11(Ui+1/2)=K11(Uf)+O(h2). Multiplying this by the bounded difference quotient in step 1.2 and using [F1] proves the stated O(h2) face-flux estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources