Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The scaled Gaussian integral and its parameter derivative

Example

For a>0, define F(a):=∫−∞∞e−ax2 dx. Then

F(a)=πa,F′(a)=−π2a3/2=−∫−∞∞x2e−ax2 dx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive parameter a.

[L2]

On an open domain and open parameter interval, if f and ∂tf are continuous, one slice is absolutely improperly integrable, and ∣∂tf∣ has an integrable bound uniform on each compact parameter interval, then F′(t)=∫D∂tf(x,t) dx (Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound).

[L3]

For real α, (xα)′=αxα−1 on (0,∞) (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

[L4]

A monotone differentiable substitution preserves convergent improper integrals under the compact-truncation hypotheses (Change of variable in an improper integral).

[L5]

Exponential decay dominates every fixed polynomial power (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

[L6]

The tail integral ∫1∞x−2 dx converges (The improper p-test for rational exponents).

[L7]

A nonnegative function dominated on a tail by a function with convergent improper integral also has a convergent tail integral (Comparison tests for improper integrals).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L4algebra

The substitution u=a x is licensed by [L4], and [L1] gives F(a)=a−1/2∫−∞∞e−u2 du=π a−1/2.

1.2L1L2L5L6L7

Let C⊂(0,∞) be compact and put m:=min⁡C>0. Then ∣∂ae−ax2∣=x2e−ax2≤x2e−mx2 for a∈C. Applying [L5] with the variable x2 shows this is eventually at most x−2, so [L6] and [L7] make both tails integrable; continuity handles the compact middle interval. The slice at a=1 is absolutely integrable by [L1]. Thus every hypothesis of [L2] holds on the open parameter interval (0,∞) and gives F′(a)=−∫−∞∞x2e−ax2 dx.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L3∎

Differentiating the explicit formula in step 1.1 with [L3] gives F′(a)=−(π/2)a−3/2, which combined with step 1.2 gives the displayed second-moment identity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources