How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Separated and nonseparated initial supports
Example
Assume AC. In , let be normalized arc-length probability on the unit circle and let be the point mass at the origin. For radii and , the support of is contained in the ball and separates the two spheres and : every continuous path from one sphere to the other meets . In contrast, the support of is contained in but does not separate those spheres. These are only checks of the topological initialization condition; neither example asserts that any flow converges or that its limit is globally minimizing.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the two probability measures in the Example.
The support of a finite Borel measure is the closed set of points whose every open neighborhood has positive measure. Support of a finite Borel measure on the plane
A continuous real-valued function on an interval takes every value between its endpoint values. Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and
Proof
Given: The measures and radii in the Example.
Every open ball centered at a point of intersects an arc of positive arc length, so [F1] gives . Since every point of has norm , the support lies in .
Let be continuous with and . The scalar map is continuous because . By [F2], it equals for some , so and the support separates the two spheres.
The support of is by [F1]. The radial segment joins to and has strictly positive norm throughout, so it avoids . Thus this support does not separate the spheres. No conclusion about energy minimizers follows from either topological calculation.
Depends on
- Wasserstein gradient flow for a feature-measure energy
- Feature-measure energy and its regularity assumptions
- Support of a finite Borel measure on the plane
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on $[a,b]$ takes every value between $f(a)$ and $f(b)$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lénaïc Chizat and Francis Bach, On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transport (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ambrosio, Gigli, and Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures (standard reference, not scraped)