How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous real-valued functions form a sheaf
Example
For each open set , let With the usual restriction of functions, this is a sheaf of sets on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open cover of an open set .
A sheaf is exactly a presheaf with locality and unique gluing on every open cover (A sheaf on a topological space).
Verification
Restriction of a continuous function is continuous, so is a presheaf. If two continuous functions on agree on every , then they agree pointwise on all of because the cover .
Let be compatible on overlaps. Define by for any with . Compatibility makes this well defined, and continuity is local on the open cover because is continuous for each . Thus [L1] holds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces, Example 7.3 (standard reference, not scraped)