How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Signed two-direction multiedge quiver-flag crossing
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited. Take the loopless quiver with two vertices and arrow multiplicities , , the dimension vector and the word . Then , and the dimension differences are and . The two triple products of the native braid relation act on the -summand by where acts on the word and acts on the word , while the distinct-color crossings act by or on and by or on the intermediate words. Since , their difference equals the native correction a nonzero polynomial whenever . Both oriented crossing factors and occur, so the multiedge multiplicities and both arrow directions enter the correction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; the two-vertex quiver with , ; the dimension vector ; the word ; the incidence data, generators and presentation of Quiver full-flag incidence varieties and signed geometric KLR generators.
Assume AC. Quiver full-flag incidence varieties and signed geometric KLR generators fixes , the normalized elementary generators with for distinct colors, , and the braid correction when .
Assume AC. Quiver-flag convolution generators satisfy the signed KLR relations supplies the action formulas: for distinct colors and for equal colors, with swapping both the two variables and the two letters.
The Axiom of Choice is present only because the consumed definition and relation suppliers inherit it; the displayed polynomial expansion is finite and choice-free (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Dimensions and normalizations. With , the defining polynomial is , and the dimension formula gives , and ; hence and . The unequal crossing normalization exponent is instead for and for ; it must not be identified with the dimension difference .
The crossing operators. The action formulas of [F2] give, on the relevant words, , , , , together with the equal-color divided differences on and on ; this exhibits the two triple products as the displayed composite operators on .
Put , , and . In the skew group algebra the two composite operators of step 2.1 expand to and . Their coefficients coincide. Thus , exactly the native correction. It is nonzero of total polynomial degree , since its coefficient is . This explicit expansion retains both the square factor from and the linear factor from ; all divisions represent polynomial operators by [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Varagnolo, E. Vasserot, Canonical bases and KLR-algebras, arXiv:0901.3992; complete 30-page article retrieved and read at the cited sections. (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Rouquier, Quiver Hecke algebras and 2-Lie algebras, arXiv:1112.3619; complete 48-page article retrieved and read at the cited sections. (standard reference, not scraped)