How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The level-one sl2 Sugawara central charge
Example
Let have basis with , , , and use the invariant form normalized by , . Then and . Substituting level into the Sugawara formula gives central charge . Consequently every level-one module satisfying the hypotheses of Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level carries the normalized Virasoro action with that central charge.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed basis and form normalization, and a level-one module satisfying the theorem's restricted-module hypotheses.
Sugawara modes and their normal ordering: the central-charge denominator is , with critical level excluded.
Dual Coxeter number for the normalized invariant form: is half the adjoint Casimir scalar.
Dual Coxeter number for the normalized invariant form: the adjoint Casimir acts by a scalar .
Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level: under the stated module hypotheses, .
Verification
The given brackets make simple: has the three distinct eigenspaces ; polynomial projections in show any nonzero ideal contains one of , and bracketing that vector with the other basis vectors yields all three. The -dual basis to is , so . In the adjoint representation, By [F2]–[F3], , hence .
The dimension is three. [F1] and [F4] therefore give . The denominator is nonzero, so the example lies away from the critical level . This is a conditional module example: it computes the central charge for every level-one module meeting the theorem hypotheses with no unitarity or integrability requirement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory, §9.2, equations (9.17)–(9.18) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Antony Wassermann, Kac–Moody and Virasoro Algebras, Chapter III §6 (standard reference, not scraped)