Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sugawara modes satisfy Virasoro at every noncritical complex level

Statement

Let g be a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra with invariant form B normalized so long roots have square 2. On every restricted affine-current module V of complex level k≠−h∨ as in Restricted affine-current module, the operators of Sugawara modes and their normal ordering satisfy [Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+c12(m3−m)δm+n,0IV,c=kdim⁡gk+h∨. Consequently these operators and C↦cIV define a representation of Virasoro algebra in the L_m convention. No energy grading, unitarity, irreducibility or integrability is assumed. The critical level is excluded from this normalized formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The restricted affine-current module V, its noncritical level k, and integers m,n.

[F1]

Sugawara modes and their normal ordering: writing q=k+h∨, 2qLn=∑a,r:Jea(r)Jea(n−r): for a B-orthonormal complex basis, with the split at r=0; these sums are locally finite and basis independent.

[F2]

Sugawara modes act on affine currents with weight one: [Lm,Jx(r)]=−rJx(m+r) on this entire module class.

[F3]

Untwisted affine central extension: [Jx(s),Jy(t)]=J[x,y](s+t)+skB(x,y)δs+t,0IV.

[F4]

Restricted affine-current module: all sufficiently large positive current modes annihilate any fixed vector.

[F5]

Virasoro algebra in the L_m convention fixes the bracket and cubic central normalization appearing in the Statement.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebrachoose

Choose a B-orthonormal basis (ea) and abbreviate ar=Jea(r). Existence follows by finite diagonalization of the nondegenerate symmetric complex form, rescaling each nonzero diagonal entry by a complex square root. Put p=m+n and let Nr(A,B) mean AB for r<0 and BA for r≥0; this subscript specifies the split, not an intrinsic index of A. Expanding by [F2] gives 2q[Lm,Ln]=∑a,r(−rNr(am+r,an−r)−(n−r)Nr(ar,ap−r)). This equality is algebraic on each v∈V. Truncate the original quadratic sum at ∣r∣≤R; it stabilizes on v and Lmv by [F1], so its commutator stabilizes to the left side. On the right, in the positive tail the rightmost indices are r or m+r, and in the negative tail they are n−r or p−r; [F4] kills all these tails for large R. Thus the displayed sum is locally finite on v, and fixed reindexings below do not create limiting errors.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Reindex the first term by s=m+r. It becomes (m−s)Ns−m(as,ap−s), whereas the desired normal order is Ns. The second term already has the latter order. Their normally ordered coefficients combine to (m−s)−(n−s)=m−n. The order difference in the first term is Ns−m(as,ap−s)−Ns(as,ap−s)=fm(s)[as,ap−s],fm(s)=1s<m−1s<0. For m>0 it is the commutator for 0≤s<m; for m<0 it is its negative for m≤s<0; for m=0 it is zero. Therefore 2q[Lm,Ln]=2q(m−n)Lp+∑s(m−s)fm(s)∑a[as,ap−s]. Every correction sum is finite, including all zero-index endpoints.

3.1F1F3F5step 2.1algebra∎

By [F3], [as,ap−s]=skδp,0IV, since [ea,ea]=0 and B(ea,ea)=1. The correction in step 2.1 is consequently kdim⁡(g)δp,0IV times ∑ss(m−s)fm(s). For m>0, the finite sum is m∑s=0m−1s−∑s=0m−1s2=(m3−m)/6. For m=−u<0, put s=−t in the negative interval; it becomes −∑t=1ut(u−t)=−(u3−u)/6=(m3−m)/6. At m=0 both sides vanish. These finite arithmetic identities follow by induction from ∑s=0d−1s=d(d−1)/2 and ∑s=0d−1s2=d(d−1)(2d−1)/6. Dividing step 2.1 by 2q≠0 gives exactly the stated central charge. The resulting brackets and the scalar central action satisfy [F5], hence give the claimed Virasoro representation, including when V=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources