How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sl2 Verma embedding chain
Example
For and , the dot reflection sends to , and the singular vector gives . At this is ; when there is no nontrivial reflection embedding from into .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The simple-reflection embedding Simple-reflection embeddings of Verma modules and the BGG criterion The BGG criterion for homomorphisms between Verma modules.
Verification
Since and , the relevant pairing is , which is positive integral exactly when .
The embedding proposition gives the displayed inclusion, including ; if the pairing is not positive integral, the BGG criterion rules out that reflection map.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, Exercise 8.11 (standard reference, not scraped)