How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The A2 regular integral-dominant Verma embedding poset
Example
Let be regular dominant integral in type . The six distinct weights are indexed by , and there is an embedding exactly when in Bruhat order. Thus the directed Hasse diagram runs from the longest element's Verma module down through the two length-two, two length-one, and identity vertices as inclusions into .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The supplied triangular decomposition for the Verma modules, Bruhat order The Bruhat order on by rank inequalities, the PBW weight model The PBW model of a Verma module, simple-root embeddings Simple-reflection embeddings of Verma modules, the Verma universal property The universal property of Verma modules, and injectivity of nonzero Verma maps A nonzero homomorphism between Verma modules is injective. The supplied decomposition makes the Cartan maximal toral, so the finite root/string structure Finite semisimple Cartan, root and string structure applies.
Verification
Put and . Both are positive integers. Write , , and . In the simple-root basis, the displacements for are respectively These are six distinct points. Their coordinatewise order is exactly Bruhat comparability: is below all, are incomparable, are incomparable, and each length-one vertex lies below each length-two vertex, with above all.
The simple-root singular-vector theorem gives embeddings for six of the eight Bruhat covers: , , , , , and . Their positive integral exponents are respectively . The two remaining covers are and , each a reflection in .
To construct the embedding directly, work in with highest vector . Choose normalized root vectors from the supplied finite root structure, and put . The root spaces give ; Jacobi and give and . The shifted Dynkin coordinates of are , so and . Set , where and , and define The displayed PBW monomials are distinct and , so . It has weight . Using the four commutators above, the coefficient of in is ; the coefficient of in is its negative, for . Both vanish because . Thus is singular, and the Verma universal property gives a nonzero map , which is injective by the cited Verma-map lemma. Interchanging the simple-root indices and constructs the embedding.
Composing the eight cover embeddings from steps 2.1 and 2.2 gives an embedding whenever in Bruhat order. Conversely, any nonzero map sends its highest vector to a nonzero vector of weight in the target. The PBW weight model therefore requires , which by the six displacements in step 1.1 is equivalent to . This proves the exact embedding poset.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, §15 (standard reference, not scraped)