How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The BGG criterion for homomorphisms between Verma modules
Statement
For weights , a nonzero homomorphism exists if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive-root embeddings Verma embedding for an arbitrary positive root, the definition The strong linkage order on weights, and necessity A Verma embedding implies strong linkage.
Proof
If , each edge in a witnessing chain gives a positive-root embedding; composing them gives a nonzero homomorphism
Conversely, write the image of the source highest vector as in the PBW model. For , a kernel vector would give in , impossible because its PBW-degree associated graded algebra is the domain . Thus the map is an embedding, and the necessity lemma gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, Theorem 15.11 (standard reference, not scraped)