How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Verma embedding for an arbitrary positive root
Statement
For , if , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Simple-reflection embeddings Simple-reflection embeddings of Verma modules and the fixed reflection and dot-action conventions Root reflections and the Weyl group action and The Weyl vector rho for a chosen positive system.
Etingof's Theorem 15.11: when two shifted weights differ by a positive-integral root reflection, the corresponding Verma module embeds uniquely in the other; its proof uses the Shapovalov determinant generically and then takes a limit.
Proof
Put and . Then and , so is related to by one positive-integral root reflection.
The source theorem [L1] applies to this one-reflection relation and gives a unique embedding . Since , this is the asserted embedding.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups, Theorem 15.11 (standard reference, not scraped)