How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smoothing a continuous circle-valued map through an annular retraction
Example
Parametrize the circle by with and define This is continuous on but not smooth at . Embedding the target circle in , approximating the planar representative smoothly, and then retracting through the standard annulus produces a smooth circle-valued map homotopic to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The continuous map on .
Verification
The map is continuous and well defined because the endpoint values and derivatives at agree. Near , has an absolute-value cusp, so fails to be smooth there.
Fix and put and . Because , the function is smooth and -periodic, so is smooth. Moreover, for one has , giving . Thus uniformly approximates the planar representative of as . Its image lies in the annulus .
The radial retraction is smooth on that annulus, and is a smooth circle-valued map. The formula for is continuous and -periodic in , so it defines a homotopy on from to . This constructs the claimed smoothing and annular retraction directly.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Smooth Approximation of Maps Between Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)